Skip to main content

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs to agree with each decision. What is important is that players agree to abide by a decision once its made and Sehwag has indicated that he did so fully.

In my mind the media's role is to inform the public of facts and then provide their view (clearly stating that the latter are hypotheses). When a media organisation starts to meld the two together, its walking on the wrong side of a very fine line.

Comments

Buttax said…
Its hilarious when an organisation/person attempts to defend themselves and doesn't realise that they're digging an even bigger hole.

Sidharth Monga is clearly clutching at straws (http://www.espncricinfo.com/commonwealth-bank-series-2012/content/current/story/555252.html). And by publishing the transcripts, he doesn't appear to realise that the only thing they prove are how much of an imbecile he is. Dhoni clearly said "it's not only these three players that we are talking about. We also have quite a few other players who are slow on the field. It will just add on to that and we will be left with just two or three really good fielders." So no singling out of Sehwag, Tendulkar, and Gambhir. And despite this, in the Sehwag press conference, the questioners clearly kept repeating that Dhoni had singled these men out. How underhanded is that?

Btw, also really funny how Sehwag says (when asked about fielding) "We are same for the last 10 years. Nothing has changed." Clearly he didn't see that could be interpreted as (and is actually) that he has been this bad for the last ten years :-)

Much fun all this.
February 26, 2012 at 11:12 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more