Skip to main content

IPL take 2 - some initial thoughts

Not at the half-way stage but there's been enough going on at the second edition of the IPL to warrant a post. The quality of cricket has been better than the last time around so far, mainly because bowlers have had more of a chance to show their skills. The success of the spinners especially is a pleasant surprise though they will probably find conditions less responsive in England come the World T20.

So far, Deccan, Delhi and Mumbai look the best bets to carry on and lift the trophy but its early days yet and things can change rapidly. In fact, that is the main appeal of T20 for me, the fact that momentum can shift so suddenly and how players deal with it is the key to winning matches. The other very interesting phenomenon has been how the 30+ batsmen seem hell-bent on proving that its not just a young man's game. A quick look at the top batting/bowling stats so far tells an interesting story. None of the top five scorers are below 34 and only three of the top 10 are below 30 (Bopara, deVilliers and Rohit Sharma). The bowling stats are almost the exact opposite, with none of the top five wicket-takers being above 30 and only four of the top 10 above 30 (Vettori barely so).  Again, I'm sure things will change on both tables but experience has an immense role to play in this format, especially in the batting.

Will try and pull together some interesting stats at the end of the tournament. Have said that before but this time hopefully, I'll actually produce something worthwhile! :-)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more