Skip to main content

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over.

And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand has floundered in the limited overs formats (injuries to Marsh, Watson and Lee haven't helped) but you can bet on them to right things pretty quickly. The two standout players for me have been Mitchell Johnson and AB deVilliers, and if they can keep this trajectory going, they should be the best players in the world in the next two years.

India has continued to perform strongly, and for a change consistently. The end was a bit disappointing with the safety-first approach in Wellington but overall, the team has genuine world-beating ability and belief combined for the first time since 2003-04. Gautam Gambhir's progress has been extraordinary and the return to form of Zaheer and Harbhajan critical. The only missing pieces are the last middle-order berth and the third seamer. They'll also need to identify reliable replacements for Dravid and Tendulkar relatively soon otherwise hopes of world domination will remain just that.

On the evidence of last season, there's a big gulf between these three teams and the rest of the world though. England and Sri Lanka are mediocre at best and seem to lack the edge in bowling (unless Ajantha Mendis can actually succeed Murali) to make them consistently challenging. New Zealand will always fight and have unearthed a gem in Jesse Ryder but without Shane Bond no team will worry about them. Pakistan and West Indies continue to be the most mercurial teams around with a lack of opportunity for the former making things worse. And the less said about Bangladesh, the better.

That said, things can change pretty rapidly and the beginning of the 2009 season, dominated as it is by T20 will likely see some upsets and the emergence of some new players especially in the IPL. The real fun begins after that though  with the Ashes and unlike the last two times, I will be cheering for Australia, not least because England deserve to lose for the way they manage their cricket. More on these later though. The 2008-09 season was a lot of fun and hopefully the 2009-2010 one will be at least as much!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When reactions lack proportion

There's been much brouhaha over India's rapid descent into one-sided football scorelines and becoming what some would term "the world's worst overseas team". And while there's some logic to the cries for wholesale changes ,  revamping the team , and attitude problems , much of it is over the top. About the only two sensible pieces I have read recently are by Ganguly and Siddhartha Vaidyanathan questioning the lack of spirit and fight shown by the team. What's most surprising to me is that some people seem to think that the team (which was ranked #1 till recently and won the World Cup less than a year back) is suddenly a pile of dung. This when there are still several pieces of information (numbers of course) that have either been ignored or not analysed clearly at all. So here's an attempt to balance the books a little. Consider the following - 1) India's overseas record in 5 year segments roughly over the last two decades is as below: 199

Kohli's team on the way to greatness?

Growing up (from a cricket watching perspective) in the 1990s, I am terribly unused to Test cricket being the format in which the Indian team is most successful and looking like potential world-beaters. Still early days, but this is exactly the way things seem headed currently for Kohli and his men. Since Jan 2015 (when Kohli took over as full time captain), India's record reads: P 21, W 14, L 1, D 6. The absurd W/L ratio will of course not last and many critics will point to the fact that most of the victories have come at home. Teams can however only overcome the opposition they are faced with and so far India have ticked off the overseas boxes they have been faced with (in Sri Lanka and the West Indies). And at home they have been utterly dominant, destroying everyone they've met. But most hearteningly, it's the way they have battled back from adversity that builds the most promise for the future. Too often in even the recent past (let alone the 1990s), Indian teams

Old dog, new tricks?

After Virat Kohli's stupendously successful start as India captain (admittedly in a different format), the cries for Dhoni to be replaced as captain for the shorter formats will undoubtedly renew again. And while Kohli might be ready to take over, I think India still have a lot to gain from Dhoni the batsman and captain at the Champions Trophy in England next year. Aside from the fact that we are not exactly rolling in good new limited overs keeper-batsmen and couldn't therefore find an adequate replacement at short notice, Dhoni has looked fitter and fresher since he gave up Test cricket. He has also, in a distinct departure from the recent past, looked keen to get stuck into situations tactically and work out ways to win with newer players. The Zimbabwe tour was a pretty light weight test but it definitely started there and its carried on into the current series against New Zealand. Most hearteningly, he has not been stubborn about his own waning skills as a batsman and