Skip to main content

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over.

And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand has floundered in the limited overs formats (injuries to Marsh, Watson and Lee haven't helped) but you can bet on them to right things pretty quickly. The two standout players for me have been Mitchell Johnson and AB deVilliers, and if they can keep this trajectory going, they should be the best players in the world in the next two years.

India has continued to perform strongly, and for a change consistently. The end was a bit disappointing with the safety-first approach in Wellington but overall, the team has genuine world-beating ability and belief combined for the first time since 2003-04. Gautam Gambhir's progress has been extraordinary and the return to form of Zaheer and Harbhajan critical. The only missing pieces are the last middle-order berth and the third seamer. They'll also need to identify reliable replacements for Dravid and Tendulkar relatively soon otherwise hopes of world domination will remain just that.

On the evidence of last season, there's a big gulf between these three teams and the rest of the world though. England and Sri Lanka are mediocre at best and seem to lack the edge in bowling (unless Ajantha Mendis can actually succeed Murali) to make them consistently challenging. New Zealand will always fight and have unearthed a gem in Jesse Ryder but without Shane Bond no team will worry about them. Pakistan and West Indies continue to be the most mercurial teams around with a lack of opportunity for the former making things worse. And the less said about Bangladesh, the better.

That said, things can change pretty rapidly and the beginning of the 2009 season, dominated as it is by T20 will likely see some upsets and the emergence of some new players especially in the IPL. The real fun begins after that though  with the Ashes and unlike the last two times, I will be cheering for Australia, not least because England deserve to lose for the way they manage their cricket. More on these later though. The 2008-09 season was a lot of fun and hopefully the 2009-2010 one will be at least as much!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...
Post a Comment
Read more