Skip to main content

A few good "nearly" men

When it comes to cricketers, I have always had a secret soft spot for those that may not be the most gifted but are really disciplined and work really hard to make the most of their abilities. The perseverance does not necessarily pay off in the most handsome fashion for all of them and many remain relative journeymen when it comes to achievements on the international stage. Its heartening therefore when such men make it to the pinnacle of domestic cricket as captains of national championship winning teams.

Cool is not quite the word I used to associate with Hrishikesh Kanitkar during his brief stint with the national team but he always came across as a man with quiet resolve and steely determination. A first class average of 53+ is pretty special and if India hadn't been blessed with their best middle order line-up ever in the 2000s, then he would have definitely played more than the two Test matches he got. Much the same can be said of Mohammad Kaif who in a parallel universe would probably have been Dravid's successor both as the #3 batsman and captain of India but a mixture of a crowded middle order, poor selection, and plain bad luck means that Kaif will forever be known as India's best fielder and a game trier. That despite their international disappointments, both Kanitkar and Kaif were able to take relatively unfashionable Ranji trophy sides in Rajasthan and UP to multiple Ranji finals and win (twice in the former's case) is a solid achievement testament to the mental strength and character of both men.

Mental strength and character is something that's no stranger for Wasim Jaffer either. In some ways, he had a heavier burden than the other two men given that he came from the Bombay school of cricket and was therefore expected to do well at the Ranji and international level. He probably did not make the most of his chances but was quite competent and remains one of the few Indian openers to have scored a double hundred outside the subcontinent. His domestic record is of course stellar though it serves as an example of the gulf that remains (and is possibly widening) between Indian domestic cricket and Test match ability.

There's many more such examples of yeoman domestic champions from other countries even just during the time I've been following cricket (Stuart Law, Glen Chapple, Daren Ganga all come to mind). But more on them some other time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...