Skip to main content

A punter you could rely on

It took me a long time to warm up to Ricky Ponting as a cricketer. I always admired his batting and the supreme ability he had to be ruthlessly dominating. Of his contemporaries/competitors for best batsmen of the modern era he always looked the most dismissive of bowlers when at his best. Lara was aesthetically pleasing, Kallis and Dravid defied bowlers to remove them from the pitch, and Tendulkar looked supremely confident. But no one played with as much seeming arrogance as the boy from Launceston. And maybe it was this typical Australian arrogance and snarling attitude that made me dislike him initially. Apart from the fact that he spit into his palms too often (or maybe the camera just liked focusing on him when he did that). Or maybe it was that he seemed to reserve his best so often for India (though thankfully not in India itself). His three highest Test innings (and three of his six double hundreds) were made against India and it was his pulverizing innings in the 2003 World Cup final that made the match lopsided. I watched each ball of the first three of those four innings and they left a searing (albeit hugely admiring) impression.

The innings that turned things around for me was his 156 at Old Trafford in the 2005 Ashes. It still counts as probably the best captain's innings that I have watched. Under pressure after England had squared the series and the Aussies were looking fragile for the first time in years, you could see Ponting visibly summon every inch of his mental strength and experience to keep his team afloat. None of his men passed 40 but Ponting battled on and made only his second fourth innings ton into a big one through sheer grit. And I can still recall the expression on his face when he was the ninth wicket to fall with four overs still left to play. Thankfully, Lee and McGrath hung on though Australia couldn't salvage the series which was the beginning of Ponting's misery as captain as he lost two more Ashes series including the first in Australia in nearly 25 years.

That though will not be his legacy. As Dan Brettig points out, most players are considered greats if they play 100 Test matches and Ponting has played in 100 victories. That plus the fact that he is arguably the best Australian batsman after the Don (ie the best human Australian batsman ;-)). Over 13,000 runs, an average of 52+ and 41 hundreds are records that will take some besting. I doubt that the Bard is particularly popular down under but if he were, the talk in pubs after Perth 2012 will be along the lines of "Mate, here was a Caesar! when comes such another?" or whatever the Aussie version of that would be.

Go well at the WACA, Punter and thanks for all the memories (painful or otherwise :-)).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When reactions lack proportion

There's been much brouhaha over India's rapid descent into one-sided football scorelines and becoming what some would term "the world's worst overseas team". And while there's some logic to the cries for wholesale changes ,  revamping the team , and attitude problems , much of it is over the top. About the only two sensible pieces I have read recently are by Ganguly and Siddhartha Vaidyanathan questioning the lack of spirit and fight shown by the team. What's most surprising to me is that some people seem to think that the team (which was ranked #1 till recently and won the World Cup less than a year back) is suddenly a pile of dung. This when there are still several pieces of information (numbers of course) that have either been ignored or not analysed clearly at all. So here's an attempt to balance the books a little. Consider the following - 1) India's overseas record in 5 year segments roughly over the last two decades is as below: 199

Kohli's team on the way to greatness?

Growing up (from a cricket watching perspective) in the 1990s, I am terribly unused to Test cricket being the format in which the Indian team is most successful and looking like potential world-beaters. Still early days, but this is exactly the way things seem headed currently for Kohli and his men. Since Jan 2015 (when Kohli took over as full time captain), India's record reads: P 21, W 14, L 1, D 6. The absurd W/L ratio will of course not last and many critics will point to the fact that most of the victories have come at home. Teams can however only overcome the opposition they are faced with and so far India have ticked off the overseas boxes they have been faced with (in Sri Lanka and the West Indies). And at home they have been utterly dominant, destroying everyone they've met. But most hearteningly, it's the way they have battled back from adversity that builds the most promise for the future. Too often in even the recent past (let alone the 1990s), Indian teams

Old dog, new tricks?

After Virat Kohli's stupendously successful start as India captain (admittedly in a different format), the cries for Dhoni to be replaced as captain for the shorter formats will undoubtedly renew again. And while Kohli might be ready to take over, I think India still have a lot to gain from Dhoni the batsman and captain at the Champions Trophy in England next year. Aside from the fact that we are not exactly rolling in good new limited overs keeper-batsmen and couldn't therefore find an adequate replacement at short notice, Dhoni has looked fitter and fresher since he gave up Test cricket. He has also, in a distinct departure from the recent past, looked keen to get stuck into situations tactically and work out ways to win with newer players. The Zimbabwe tour was a pretty light weight test but it definitely started there and its carried on into the current series against New Zealand. Most hearteningly, he has not been stubborn about his own waning skills as a batsman and