Skip to main content

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The return of Harris at the expense of Mitchell Johnson was always on the cards as soon as the former regained fitness. All in all, I'd have to agree with (what seems to be) the unanimous view that this is the best the Aussie selectors could have done. Not sure about the "worst squad since 1985" comments given I didn't see that team in action.

I don't however agree with Matt Cleary's first XI. I think Australia are at their best when they play with a solid opening pair capable of long partnerships, depth in batting, and strong pace bowling. While the last can be achieved with more or less any of the fast men in the squad, the first two are easier said than done given that they have five opening batsmen in the squad! My line-up for Trent Bridge would be (in batting order): Rogers, Cowan, Hughes, Clarke, Khawaja, Watson, Haddin, Siddle, Harris, Pattinson, Lyon. Warner's temperament is still too suspect for my liking and I've always thought that Watson fits in better in the middle order given his ability/tendency to score attacking fifties. Harris and Pattinson will likely not play all five games so the fact that there is solid back-up in Starc and Bird is a good thing.

Turning to England, in my opinion they are not the runaway favourites that everyone's making them out to be especially given how they struggled against NZ. The fitness of two of their four match-winners is still in question and were Pietersen and Swann (especially the latter) not able to pull through, the series suddenly takes on a different look. Their back-up seam bowling is also more questionable when compared to their opponents though they will be playing at home.

Starting to build up nicely this and though my early stage prediction would be a 2-1 win for the English, I'm sure I'll change my mind a few times between now and July 10 :-)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When reactions lack proportion

There's been much brouhaha over India's rapid descent into one-sided football scorelines and becoming what some would term "the world's worst overseas team". And while there's some logic to the cries for wholesale changes ,  revamping the team , and attitude problems , much of it is over the top. About the only two sensible pieces I have read recently are by Ganguly and Siddhartha Vaidyanathan questioning the lack of spirit and fight shown by the team. What's most surprising to me is that some people seem to think that the team (which was ranked #1 till recently and won the World Cup less than a year back) is suddenly a pile of dung. This when there are still several pieces of information (numbers of course) that have either been ignored or not analysed clearly at all. So here's an attempt to balance the books a little. Consider the following - 1) India's overseas record in 5 year segments roughly over the last two decades is as below: 199
Post a Comment
Read more

Kohli's team on the way to greatness?

Growing up (from a cricket watching perspective) in the 1990s, I am terribly unused to Test cricket being the format in which the Indian team is most successful and looking like potential world-beaters. Still early days, but this is exactly the way things seem headed currently for Kohli and his men. Since Jan 2015 (when Kohli took over as full time captain), India's record reads: P 21, W 14, L 1, D 6. The absurd W/L ratio will of course not last and many critics will point to the fact that most of the victories have come at home. Teams can however only overcome the opposition they are faced with and so far India have ticked off the overseas boxes they have been faced with (in Sri Lanka and the West Indies). And at home they have been utterly dominant, destroying everyone they've met. But most hearteningly, it's the way they have battled back from adversity that builds the most promise for the future. Too often in even the recent past (let alone the 1990s), Indian teams
Post a Comment
Read more

Old dog, new tricks?

After Virat Kohli's stupendously successful start as India captain (admittedly in a different format), the cries for Dhoni to be replaced as captain for the shorter formats will undoubtedly renew again. And while Kohli might be ready to take over, I think India still have a lot to gain from Dhoni the batsman and captain at the Champions Trophy in England next year. Aside from the fact that we are not exactly rolling in good new limited overs keeper-batsmen and couldn't therefore find an adequate replacement at short notice, Dhoni has looked fitter and fresher since he gave up Test cricket. He has also, in a distinct departure from the recent past, looked keen to get stuck into situations tactically and work out ways to win with newer players. The Zimbabwe tour was a pretty light weight test but it definitely started there and its carried on into the current series against New Zealand. Most hearteningly, he has not been stubborn about his own waning skills as a batsman and
Post a Comment
Read more