Skip to main content

Team India's macho man

Virender Sehwag and Dharmendra have more than just an iconic name in common. Their careers started off with great dash and promise and for a while they delivered a wide variety of gems (amidst some minor blips). And as they grew older but refused to acknowledge that fact in their performances, watching them was like watching an extended blooper reel. And just like Garam Dharam did in the late 1990s, a couple of decades later, the butcher of Najafgarh looks destined to fade away similarly (much as I had feared in a post from a little over six months back).

I've had the good fortune to have followed more or less his entire career and have watched him play some fabulous knocks and deliver some spectacular results for India (particularly in the subcontinent). My favourite two innings of his both came in 2008. The first was his comeback hundred in Adelaide to help save the game and where he showed the potential to grind his way and mould his innings to the situation for the first time. And the second was the spectacular double hundred at Galle when all others were floundering against Murali and Mendis. However, I never really warmed to him the way I did to Tendulkar, Dravid, or Laxman (not to mention a legion of foreign batsmen). Primarily I think it was the fact that he never ever seemed inclined to put in the extra yard to make the most of his talent. Whether it was battling through a tough session when not in form or putting in the diving stop, Sehwag always gave off a "this-is-how-I-play" attitude. Which was great when it came off but looked silly when it didn't. And while I wouldn't be as harsh on him as Dileep Premachandran is in this piece, stats don't lie over a long period and it cannot be denied that Sehwag never came close to fulfilling his potential outside of India. To label him better or even comparable to Gavaskar amongst Indian openers is laughable to say the least (though that piece by Ramachandra Guha is eminently readable otherwise). Overall, Sehwag averaged 35.36 in matches outside the subcontinent (excluding Zimbabwe) whereas Gavaskar averaged 51.57. In Tests India won outside the subcontinent during his career (again excluding Zimbabwe), Sehwag averages 24.66 whereas Gavaskar averaged 50.40. Clearly Sehwag had a major problem on the pitches of Eng, Aus, SA, WI, and NZ which he never came close to addressing. And all this is without even going into his ODI game which if anything is an even greater story of unfulfilled potential given that in limited overs games pitches are on average much more benign and therefore this weakness could be covered somewhat easily.

All that looks to be in the past now though. With his dropping midway through a historic series win for India where the batting young guns carried them through, it looks like we're unlikely to see Sehwag come out to open for India (in any format) ever again. And funnily enough, the thing I will miss about him is not the audacity and the effortless drives, but the smile he mostly seemed to have on his face and the perennial air of "this is only a game, why's everyone being so serious" that he had about him. In an increasingly business like world, that spirit is something many people (sporting or otherwise) would do well to imbibe to a degree. His talent may have been unfulfilled but I doubt that Sehwag will lose sleep over it and so maybe we shouldn't on his behalf either. Like Dharmendra, here was another Jat who gave us lots of joy and lots of great moments and when the sun sets on his career, that's all we really need to remember.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...