Skip to main content

Left fast magic

I have always liked the word southpaw. You know how there are some words that one takes an affinity to for inexplicable reasons? Southpaw is one of those for me. In a cricketing context I always found it ironic that the term was used much more for left-handed batsmen than left arm bowlers, especially given the origin of the word.

Left arm pace bowlers are a breed I've always loved watching primarily because Wasim Akram was one of my favourite cricketers in my early days of following the game. There was something completely magical and joyful in the way he bowled and I can still recall some of his incredible spells from the early '90s. The memorable '92 WC final of course with those two magic balls, but even more so the first morning of the Oval Test in 1992 a few months later and the sensational spells he and Waqar Younis conjured up to blow away the Kiwis early the next year. Other left arm quicks since haven't quite matched up, but nevertheless Bruce Reid, Chaminda Vaas, Zaheer Khan, Mitchell Johnson, and Irfan Pathan have all been very good in their own right and on their days great to watch. In fact, I've been fortunate that of the eleven left arm seamers to take more than 100 Test wickets, seven have played most (if not all) their cricket during my viewing years.

It was nice then to see a couple of pieces on ESPNcricinfo recently with odes to some left arm bowlers suggesting that I was not alone in my appreciation for the breed. First, this excellently written piece by Jon Hotten which focuses on the mercurial Johnson and how he will be missed during the Ashes. And while I don't fully agree (with a misfiring batting line-up, Clarke and the Aussies don't really need a bowler who can implode as spectacularly as Mitch is capable of), he is fascinating to watch at all times. And while he'll continue to be an important component of the ODI and T20 teams, his Test match career looks to be practically over given the plethora of young, talented quicks the Aussies have lined up. India on the other hand have never had such riches and so its a shame that someone like Ashish Nehra never went on to become the capable Test match bowler he should have been due to a combination of injuries and mismanagement. He did provide us many moments to cherish though as this piece points out, particularly in World Cups. My favourite Nehra moment though comes from the Port of Spain Test in 2002, when he knocked over Lara and Hooper in quick succession during a tight fourth innings chase. India went on to their first Test win in the Caribbean since 1976 and in Nehra and Zaheer Khan it looked like a solid succession line to Srinath had been built. Sadly only one of the two went on to bigger things.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When reactions lack proportion

There's been much brouhaha over India's rapid descent into one-sided football scorelines and becoming what some would term "the world's worst overseas team". And while there's some logic to the cries for wholesale changes ,  revamping the team , and attitude problems , much of it is over the top. About the only two sensible pieces I have read recently are by Ganguly and Siddhartha Vaidyanathan questioning the lack of spirit and fight shown by the team. What's most surprising to me is that some people seem to think that the team (which was ranked #1 till recently and won the World Cup less than a year back) is suddenly a pile of dung. This when there are still several pieces of information (numbers of course) that have either been ignored or not analysed clearly at all. So here's an attempt to balance the books a little. Consider the following - 1) India's overseas record in 5 year segments roughly over the last two decades is as below: 199

Kohli's team on the way to greatness?

Growing up (from a cricket watching perspective) in the 1990s, I am terribly unused to Test cricket being the format in which the Indian team is most successful and looking like potential world-beaters. Still early days, but this is exactly the way things seem headed currently for Kohli and his men. Since Jan 2015 (when Kohli took over as full time captain), India's record reads: P 21, W 14, L 1, D 6. The absurd W/L ratio will of course not last and many critics will point to the fact that most of the victories have come at home. Teams can however only overcome the opposition they are faced with and so far India have ticked off the overseas boxes they have been faced with (in Sri Lanka and the West Indies). And at home they have been utterly dominant, destroying everyone they've met. But most hearteningly, it's the way they have battled back from adversity that builds the most promise for the future. Too often in even the recent past (let alone the 1990s), Indian teams

Old dog, new tricks?

After Virat Kohli's stupendously successful start as India captain (admittedly in a different format), the cries for Dhoni to be replaced as captain for the shorter formats will undoubtedly renew again. And while Kohli might be ready to take over, I think India still have a lot to gain from Dhoni the batsman and captain at the Champions Trophy in England next year. Aside from the fact that we are not exactly rolling in good new limited overs keeper-batsmen and couldn't therefore find an adequate replacement at short notice, Dhoni has looked fitter and fresher since he gave up Test cricket. He has also, in a distinct departure from the recent past, looked keen to get stuck into situations tactically and work out ways to win with newer players. The Zimbabwe tour was a pretty light weight test but it definitely started there and its carried on into the current series against New Zealand. Most hearteningly, he has not been stubborn about his own waning skills as a batsman and