Skip to main content

The eternal hunt for the next Kapil

Kapil Dev was probably the most magical player India has ever produced (even ahead of Tendulkar and Gavaskar), partly because it was always so unlikely that a country like India would produce a fast-bowling allrounder (as Gideon Haigh captures so eloquently in this piece). In some ways though he is also the worst thing that could have happened to modern Indian cricket, kicking off as it did an eternal pace-bowling all-rounder hunt since he retired about twenty years ago. Often (especially when India are doing badly), it feels like the solution to all problems would be to find a new Kapil Dev. The list of players who have shown a bit of promise and been branded the new Kapil Dev is probably only a bit shorter than a similar list drawn up by English fans (and selectors) of the next Botham.

First there were the 1983 World Cup men in Madan Lal and Roger Binny who despite their stellar efforts in that tournament and ample opportunities in Test cricket (39 and 27 caps respectively) never quite cut it as international all-rounders primarily because they were not consistently good enough in either discipline. Then came Manoj Prabhakar who with his banana swing and doughty opening batting was certainly more effective than the earlier two but Jayasuriya and the match-fixing saga brought an end to his hopes. After a brief hiatus, came the man most inexplicably termed the "next Kapil Dev". Ajit Agarkar's first class record when he got picked for India in April '98 had nothing to suggest that he should be considered anything but a quick bowler. Yet, the flashes of incredibly good (and incredibly bad) cricket he managed to produce meant that he was branded something he really could never be. And finally, there was Irfan Pathan who came closest of all to fulfilling the role of a true allrounder (even if not the next Kapil Dev). Debuting in the match that had what was probably Agarkar's best performance, Pathan was as close to a left-handed clone of Kapil as India would probably ever produce. Prodigious swing at a decent clip allied with a smooth batting technique with big hitting ability meant that he was quickly anointed India's new hope till injuries and a dip in form stymied his career.

Such has the Indian obsession been with finding a seam bowling allrounder that an alien from Mars might think that spin bowlers in India never learn to bat. The truth though is that they never got the right sort of backing or assistance. Ravi Shastri was not as gifted as Kapil Dev but would have ended up with much better figures if he had not been forced to play the role of stock bowler and "crisis-batsmen-anywhere-in-the-order" through much of his career. Anil Kumble scored three hundreds (and three fifties) in his first three Ranji seasons and was good enough to score a Test match ton at age 37 but he batted at #7 just eight times (barring injury to other players) out of 173 innings. Harbhajan Singh was always capable with the bat (as two back to back Test hundreds with India in trouble testify) but he regularly bats 7 or below for his domestic team. Sunil Joshi and Ashish Kapoor had promise but never the confidence of the selectors or their captains.

So its ironic that now, the two men pinned down as the next all-round hopes for India are also the first choice spin bowlers across most formats. Ravindra Jadeja has had a lot to live upto ever since Shane Warne christened him a rockstar, and Ravichandran Ashwin also rose to fame through the IPL despite having a solid first class record even prior to that tournament launching. A quick look at their first class records shows that they both pass the allrounder sniff-test of "Batting avg - Bowling avg >= 3-4 runs" (and in Jadeja's case its an astonishing 25+ runs!) and so far at the international level, they have certainly demonstrated enough ability of their potential. Jadeja in particular has come on in leaps and bounds in the last year or so and has just made it to the top spot in the ODI bowling rankings (and will likely do in the allrounder rankings too given that India play much more than Bangladesh in the next few months). Its their Test match performances though that will demonstrate whether they are the real McCoy or not. As Harsha Bhogle summarises it in one of his pieces on ESPNcricinfo, a lower middle order that reads Jadeja, Dhoni, Ashwin at 6, 7, and 8 will be one of the most important elements of building a competitive Indian side capable of getting back to the top of the rankings. And given that Jadeja averages 50+ in first class cricket surely he should be batting ahead of Dhoni and allowing the skipper to play his natural game at #7. In that light, its a bit of a missed opportunity that Jadeja is not with the 'A' team currently touring South Africa. Ajinkya Rahane at #6 is a bit of a misfit and will not help Fletcher learn anything new about him and playing Jadeja there instead would have given him a chance to at least get a taste for the role. Ashwin on the other hand already has the highest average of all time amongst Indian bowlers (who've played at least 15 games and picked up 50 or more wickets) so he just needs to keep the focus and not let the pressure of being the team's goto spin bowler take away from his batting. The next year or two will tell us whether these two can go on to bigger things and it'll be an interesting journey to follow. If they do maybe then there won't be as much talk of finding a new Kapil Dev.

An edited version of this piece is here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When reactions lack proportion

There's been much brouhaha over India's rapid descent into one-sided football scorelines and becoming what some would term "the world's worst overseas team". And while there's some logic to the cries for wholesale changes ,  revamping the team , and attitude problems , much of it is over the top. About the only two sensible pieces I have read recently are by Ganguly and Siddhartha Vaidyanathan questioning the lack of spirit and fight shown by the team. What's most surprising to me is that some people seem to think that the team (which was ranked #1 till recently and won the World Cup less than a year back) is suddenly a pile of dung. This when there are still several pieces of information (numbers of course) that have either been ignored or not analysed clearly at all. So here's an attempt to balance the books a little. Consider the following - 1) India's overseas record in 5 year segments roughly over the last two decades is as below: 199

Kohli's team on the way to greatness?

Growing up (from a cricket watching perspective) in the 1990s, I am terribly unused to Test cricket being the format in which the Indian team is most successful and looking like potential world-beaters. Still early days, but this is exactly the way things seem headed currently for Kohli and his men. Since Jan 2015 (when Kohli took over as full time captain), India's record reads: P 21, W 14, L 1, D 6. The absurd W/L ratio will of course not last and many critics will point to the fact that most of the victories have come at home. Teams can however only overcome the opposition they are faced with and so far India have ticked off the overseas boxes they have been faced with (in Sri Lanka and the West Indies). And at home they have been utterly dominant, destroying everyone they've met. But most hearteningly, it's the way they have battled back from adversity that builds the most promise for the future. Too often in even the recent past (let alone the 1990s), Indian teams

Old dog, new tricks?

After Virat Kohli's stupendously successful start as India captain (admittedly in a different format), the cries for Dhoni to be replaced as captain for the shorter formats will undoubtedly renew again. And while Kohli might be ready to take over, I think India still have a lot to gain from Dhoni the batsman and captain at the Champions Trophy in England next year. Aside from the fact that we are not exactly rolling in good new limited overs keeper-batsmen and couldn't therefore find an adequate replacement at short notice, Dhoni has looked fitter and fresher since he gave up Test cricket. He has also, in a distinct departure from the recent past, looked keen to get stuck into situations tactically and work out ways to win with newer players. The Zimbabwe tour was a pretty light weight test but it definitely started there and its carried on into the current series against New Zealand. Most hearteningly, he has not been stubborn about his own waning skills as a batsman and