Skip to main content

The trial begins

I can't recall a time ever when I've been this excited about a series which I was certain would end in an Indian defeat. India have won just two of the 15 matches they've played on South African soil and there's no reason to believe that they will add to that meagre tally this time. If an inexperienced batting line-up (the likely top 6 have a combined experience of 59 matches) made things difficult, a thrashing in the ODI series followed by a washed out practice game almost seals the series before it begins. That's where India's best chance might lie though. No one expects them to do well including the opposition and that can sometimes be a tricky mindset for host nations. Smith and his men are experienced enough to pull up their socks if things slip (like they did in the UAE recently) but to a degree they will be going in assuming an easy win and if India's batting can withstand some of the pressure they might at least go into day five.

For once though it will have to be the bowling (as Dhoni says) that will need to lead the side. Zaheer, Ashwin, and Ishant (if the latter plays) are all experienced campaigners and will need to step up to ensure that India are not facing 500+ totals when they bat. And while picking Ishant ahead of Bhuvneshwar Kumar seems unfair given recent performances, Dhoni's lack of faith in the latter with the old ball means that Ishant has to slot back in. Especially if India take the safe option and play six batsmen (instead of Dhoni at 6 and Jadeja at 7) as looks likely. And for those six men, the challenge is to not lose faith in their abilities that got them here in the first place. I don't fancy the batting order that Sidharth Monga outlines here, but given Rahane's inexperience it may not be a bad thing to start with. Longer term though, I'd like to see Rahane at 3 followed by Pujara, Kohli, and Rohit. Either way, it will be exciting to see which of the six can steel themselves to stay the course and score runs and make a name for themselves.

Regardless of what happens though, this series is the first step in a long journey for a young team and the next two years are Dhoni's chance to seal his legacy (though the man himself wouldn't have given any thought to that). My predictions for the ODI series of course fell completely flat but if the Test series prediction comes true, a 0-1 result would almost feel like a victory for this young team.

A word on the Springboks too. In a time when most teams are rebuilding (or are going to have to like England now), and tend to struggle away, they have a really settled line-up and can afford to play seven batsmen and yet have five bowlers. And in Smith, Kallis, Amla, de Villiers, Steyn, Philander, and Morkel they have a core of players who might all fit into a world XI (okay maybe only five of them), and certainly at least four of them would feature in an all-time South African line-up. They are a proud team and know that they haven't defeated India in a series in almost seven years and will be keen to set that record straight.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...