Skip to main content

A real decider or another India thrashing?

Mahendra Singh Dhoni does not come across as a man who lays too much store by Fate but if he did, he could be forgiven for thinking that he's just not destined to captain India to a series win outside the subcontinent any more. His fledgling team came close in both South Africa and New Zealand but could not land the final blows. In England this summer, he's gone against habit and picked five bowlers (though not always the right ones) in three of the four games so far, coaxed a matchwinning performance out of a perennially underperforming pacer, scored the most runs he's ever done in an overseas series, and taken the lead. And yet he now founds his side down 1-2 after successive thrashings and the wheels are starting to fall off everywhere.

His record as captain outside the subcontinent is still comparable to most Indian captains of the past (with the exception of Dravid whose W/L ratio is way ahead of everyone else). Dhoni is a proud man though and he will want to improve that W/L ratio as much as possible before he quits the format. As Greg Chappell points out though, the lack of a consistently potent pace attack is what has held him back mostly and led to his defensiveness and apparent lack of conviction at times. More on that another day though.

The Oval offers this young, developing India team a last chance to avoid another thrashing and put up a strong fight rather than end with a 1-3 result. The long series is (as expected) starting to take its toll on players not used to it and there was a lack of resolve from large parts of the team in Manchester (with Ashwin and Aaron who were playing their first games the notable exceptions). Picking up 20 wickets was always going to be the main challenge for India and so it has proved especially after Ishant Sharma's injury.

Of greater concern though will be the fact that their best batsmen Pujara and Kohli have struggled so much for runs. The latter has scored fewer runs than Anderson so far, leaving Rahane to hold the middle order together all by himself. England on the other hand have had Ballance, Root, and Bell all amongst the runs thereby neutralising the relative failure of their openers. India's openers have not clicked together either despite Vijay's strong series and they have now gone 32 innings since their last 50+ opening stand outside Asia. That kind of pressure tells eventually and is a big part of the three under-200 rolling overs in the last three innings. There are no easy answers but Gambhir probably deserves another go alongside Vijay now that he has been brought back into the side. Longer term, it wouldn't be the worst move to consider pushing Rahane up to open and have Rohit Sharma at #5.

The rest of the batsmen also keep their places as should Bhuvneshwar, Aaron, Ashwin, and Jadeja. That leaves one open slot for Ishant or Shami depending on the former's fitness. The Oval is the likeliest venue to be batting and spin friendly as evidenced by the fact that the last three Division 2 fixtures there have seen 4 totals above 350 and the likes of even Dilshan and Solanki pick up wickets with their part-time spin. Dhoni will need Ashwin and Jadeja to step up and not be outbowled by Moeen Ali this time.

England have a young, developing side too but their batting in particular is heading in very much the right direction. Ballance and Root have been rock solid through the summer and with Bell and Cook starting to hit form as well, the likes of Pietersen and Trott have not been missed at least against India's relatively pedestrian attack. Buttler's inclusion has given them an additional fillip and the lower order have scored useful runs too. There are still some issues, notably with Robson's failures and Moeen's "short"comings but the team's turnaround has probably won them a bit more time.

The return to form of Anderson and Broad and the impact that Moeen Ali has had will also mean that Cook has far fewer bowling worries than Dhoni does. The back-up seamers haven't convinced especially since Plunkett's departure though and it'll be interesting to see whether Cook gambles on bringing in Finn (ahead of Jordan) against a fragile Indian top order. And I've been a big fan of Chris Woakes for a few years but for this England line-up, Ben Stokes is probably a better long term bet for the allrounder position. Cook and Moores are conservative though and they will probably stick with Woakes and Jordan based on the modern logic of not changing a winning side.

All in all, we should have a fascinating finale in London, primarily because of how the momentum has shifted since the teams were last in the city. My pre-series prediction of England winning 2-1 has already come true so my betting persona is hoping for an exciting last over draw!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When reactions lack proportion

There's been much brouhaha over India's rapid descent into one-sided football scorelines and becoming what some would term "the world's worst overseas team". And while there's some logic to the cries for wholesale changes ,  revamping the team , and attitude problems , much of it is over the top. About the only two sensible pieces I have read recently are by Ganguly and Siddhartha Vaidyanathan questioning the lack of spirit and fight shown by the team. What's most surprising to me is that some people seem to think that the team (which was ranked #1 till recently and won the World Cup less than a year back) is suddenly a pile of dung. This when there are still several pieces of information (numbers of course) that have either been ignored or not analysed clearly at all. So here's an attempt to balance the books a little. Consider the following - 1) India's overseas record in 5 year segments roughly over the last two decades is as below: 199

Kohli's team on the way to greatness?

Growing up (from a cricket watching perspective) in the 1990s, I am terribly unused to Test cricket being the format in which the Indian team is most successful and looking like potential world-beaters. Still early days, but this is exactly the way things seem headed currently for Kohli and his men. Since Jan 2015 (when Kohli took over as full time captain), India's record reads: P 21, W 14, L 1, D 6. The absurd W/L ratio will of course not last and many critics will point to the fact that most of the victories have come at home. Teams can however only overcome the opposition they are faced with and so far India have ticked off the overseas boxes they have been faced with (in Sri Lanka and the West Indies). And at home they have been utterly dominant, destroying everyone they've met. But most hearteningly, it's the way they have battled back from adversity that builds the most promise for the future. Too often in even the recent past (let alone the 1990s), Indian teams

Old dog, new tricks?

After Virat Kohli's stupendously successful start as India captain (admittedly in a different format), the cries for Dhoni to be replaced as captain for the shorter formats will undoubtedly renew again. And while Kohli might be ready to take over, I think India still have a lot to gain from Dhoni the batsman and captain at the Champions Trophy in England next year. Aside from the fact that we are not exactly rolling in good new limited overs keeper-batsmen and couldn't therefore find an adequate replacement at short notice, Dhoni has looked fitter and fresher since he gave up Test cricket. He has also, in a distinct departure from the recent past, looked keen to get stuck into situations tactically and work out ways to win with newer players. The Zimbabwe tour was a pretty light weight test but it definitely started there and its carried on into the current series against New Zealand. Most hearteningly, he has not been stubborn about his own waning skills as a batsman and