Skip to main content

New eras, new leaders

The last time India and Australia played a series of four matches (or more) with no changes in captaincy on either side, the Aussies were still a largely all-conquering team and Clarke and Dhoni had just about established themselves as mainstays. The current series is the fourth full one since then (excluding the two match series in 2010) and a combination of injury, retirement, and suspensions has meant that each one has featured multiple leaders. And this time has been one better with changes on both sides. I can't remember when that happened last even in a series involving England :-)

Going in, the expectation was that Dhoni would miss the first Test but captain for the rest and Haddin would stand in for Clarke for the full series. Two shocks of varying degrees in Hughes' tragic death and Dhoni's sudden retirement have turned that around on its head and its the future leaders (and currently the best batsman) on either side who're in charge heading into Sydney.

For Kohli and India, its certainly a new era and a chance to start to shape a team for the future. So far in this tour, the batting (or a few of the batsmen) has shown signs of settling but the bowling continues to be horrid (as Kohli is finding out the hard way at the time of writing this). Ishant Sharma is now not just the most experienced player in the side but also the only bowler who appears to have any sort of control over his radar. Its unfortunate that Shami, Yadav, and Aaron who all made bright starts to their careers in India haven't shown the ability to replicate anything remotely close to it overseas. Worse still, they can't even appear to do the basics of putting six balls in the same place in an over consistently. And when Australia's spinner outbowls India's you know things can't be good. Kohli has made all the right noises about boldness as captain so far but he will quickly realise that when your bowlers can't back it up with performances, those same words can get very hollow very soon. He will learn with time but unless India can find bowlers who can do the same, that ranking is not going anywhere anytime soon.

Steve Smith has no such worries with his bowling line-up, not for the moment at least. Harris and Johnson are certainly amongst the top bowlers in world cricket today and probably amongst the best ten that Australia have ever produced, certainly on the basis of strike rate. Hazlewood and Lyon have also been solid and a bench consisting of Starc, Siddle, Pattinson, Cummins etc is one that most teams would be very envious of. Its not a stretch to say that when fully fit, any of these guys would be better than the drivel that goes in the name of Indian pace bowling.

It is the source of runs that will give Smith and Australia more cause to worry, especially for the future. With Clarke's return uncertain, there is a dangerous degree of dependence on Warner and Smith to do the century making. Rogers has contributed consistently but he won't be around much longer and the rest of the line-up hasn't been shown up only because the bowling they've faced has been so shoddy. Watson is clearly on borrowed time, and Marsh and Burns nowhere near settled. England will not be overly concerned about the summer just yet, especially if Anderson and Broad can stay fit.

India's batting on the other hand is its sole shining star at the moment, and especially compared to the bowling looks positively opulent. Kohli, Rahane, and Vijay have all gone a long way to establishing their credentials overseas and Pujara and Rohit Sharma are too good to not do the same fairly soon. There's lots of contenders around for the keeper's slot as well and Dhoni's batting shouldn't be missed much. His calmness as skipper on the other hand will be, especially when the bowling is going at five an over (as they are right now).

For now, I'm sticking with my original 3-0 prediction. That would plummet India to #7 on the ICC rankings, which seems a good assessment of the task that lies ahead for Kohli. The new era is not quite here yet for India, at least by way of results.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When reactions lack proportion

There's been much brouhaha over India's rapid descent into one-sided football scorelines and becoming what some would term "the world's worst overseas team". And while there's some logic to the cries for wholesale changes ,  revamping the team , and attitude problems , much of it is over the top. About the only two sensible pieces I have read recently are by Ganguly and Siddhartha Vaidyanathan questioning the lack of spirit and fight shown by the team. What's most surprising to me is that some people seem to think that the team (which was ranked #1 till recently and won the World Cup less than a year back) is suddenly a pile of dung. This when there are still several pieces of information (numbers of course) that have either been ignored or not analysed clearly at all. So here's an attempt to balance the books a little. Consider the following - 1) India's overseas record in 5 year segments roughly over the last two decades is as below: 199

Kohli's team on the way to greatness?

Growing up (from a cricket watching perspective) in the 1990s, I am terribly unused to Test cricket being the format in which the Indian team is most successful and looking like potential world-beaters. Still early days, but this is exactly the way things seem headed currently for Kohli and his men. Since Jan 2015 (when Kohli took over as full time captain), India's record reads: P 21, W 14, L 1, D 6. The absurd W/L ratio will of course not last and many critics will point to the fact that most of the victories have come at home. Teams can however only overcome the opposition they are faced with and so far India have ticked off the overseas boxes they have been faced with (in Sri Lanka and the West Indies). And at home they have been utterly dominant, destroying everyone they've met. But most hearteningly, it's the way they have battled back from adversity that builds the most promise for the future. Too often in even the recent past (let alone the 1990s), Indian teams

Old dog, new tricks?

After Virat Kohli's stupendously successful start as India captain (admittedly in a different format), the cries for Dhoni to be replaced as captain for the shorter formats will undoubtedly renew again. And while Kohli might be ready to take over, I think India still have a lot to gain from Dhoni the batsman and captain at the Champions Trophy in England next year. Aside from the fact that we are not exactly rolling in good new limited overs keeper-batsmen and couldn't therefore find an adequate replacement at short notice, Dhoni has looked fitter and fresher since he gave up Test cricket. He has also, in a distinct departure from the recent past, looked keen to get stuck into situations tactically and work out ways to win with newer players. The Zimbabwe tour was a pretty light weight test but it definitely started there and its carried on into the current series against New Zealand. Most hearteningly, he has not been stubborn about his own waning skills as a batsman and