Skip to main content

An Asian Test summer

Little that's happened in the cricketing world recently has given me as much pleasure as Pakistan's ascent to the #1 ranking in Tests. Though it finally happened in slightly farcical circumstances with the outfield fiasco in Port-of-Spain, it couldn't have come at a better time for the country, and more importantly Misbah-ul-Haq deserved it for the sterling job he's done in the last five years.

Sportspersons are constantly challenged in having to live out of hotel rooms and away from friends and family for long periods of time. And for this Pakistan team, the burden has been manifold given the inability to play even their own domestic T20 league at home, let alone international cricket. Not for a month, or a year but for nearly seven years now. That needs a huge degree of mental toughness especially for the younger players, not to say adjusting to non-home conditions. Coupled with that toughness, the other quality that this team has displayed unlike some of their predecessors is one of resilience and the ability to hang in there and fight back. As Hassan Cheema put it (much more eloquently than I can hope to), Misbah and Younis have moulded a team in their image and no praise is high enough. The best captain and best batsman (arguable both but I'd be willing to make a case) that Pakistan have had in Test cricket deserve the #1 ranking before they exit the game sometime soon. Amongst all Asian captains (who have skippered their side in more than 25 Tests), Misbah's win-loss ratio puts him ahead of all comers other than Miandad and Imran. That's ahead of acclaimed captains like Dhoni, Ganguly, Jayawardene, and Ranatunga. And barring Younis Khan, he's not had access to any all-time Pakistan greats of the likes of Wasim, Waqar, Qadir, Saleem Malik, Saqlain Mushtaq, Zaheer Abbas, and many more. Granted he's only played two matches against Australia and none against India but that's still one heck of a record. And amongst all Asian batsmen (with more than 3000 runs), Younis' average of 53.72 puts him ahead of any of his countrymen and only just behind Tendulkar and Sangakkara. Not bad for someone who's still made fun of after every couple of failures. He's also the only Pakistani to score more than 25 Test match hundreds and assuming he carries on for the tours of NZ and Australia will likely become the first batsman from his nation to go past the 10,000 run mark.

Asian success as a whole in Test cricket has been the story of this summer. Pakistan have grabbed many of the headlines given their ascent to #1 but Sri Lanka's whitewash of Australia, and India's performance in the West Indies are no less noteworthy. The Lankans spectacularly turned around a summer (and year) that had been disastrous up to then with their mauling of Smith and his (erstwhile) #1 team. And very hearteningly they did this on the back of nearly everyone in the team contributing at different stages of the matches. At the start of the tour, Mathews, Herath, and Chandimal were the only certain starters in their XI but by the finish they'd uncovered a potential world-beater of a batsman in Kusal Mendis, and a few other solid cricketers in Dilruwan Perera, Dhananjaya de Silva, Lakshan Sandakan, and a resurgent Kaushal Silva. They've been in transition for a long time now, but seem to finally be turning a corner and that can only be good for Test cricket.

India's win in the Caribbean was only the fifth time that they won two or more Tests in a series outside the subcontinent. And one of the earlier four was a 2-3 loss to a Packer ravaged Australian team, and one was in Zimbabwe (ie effectively doesn't count). The fact that something this rare will ultimately be considered slightly disappointing is a measure of both how quickly Kohli's young team has gelled and also how far the men in maroon have fallen. A lot of my pre-series questions have been answered (at least in my head) with the main outstanding one being whether Pujara or Rohit Sharma should be first choice. To me it feels like Rohit is the obvious answer but clearly many others think differently. 13 Test matches should certainly be enough to find the answer.

Tougher assignments loom ahead for all three teams. India have their longest home season ever and anything less than victory in 9-10 of the 13 Tests and in all four series will be viewed as a disappointment. For a team where only one player has played more than 50 Tests (Ishant) and only four have played more than 30 (Kohli, Ashwin, Vijay, and Pujara), that is not a small challenge. Pakistan and Sri Lanka will be presented with the familiar vulnerability of Asian teams - winning outside the subcontinent, the former in NZ and Australia, and the latter in South Africa. The summer has belonged to them but the winter will tell us what these teams are truly made of.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When reactions lack proportion

There's been much brouhaha over India's rapid descent into one-sided football scorelines and becoming what some would term "the world's worst overseas team". And while there's some logic to the cries for wholesale changes ,  revamping the team , and attitude problems , much of it is over the top. About the only two sensible pieces I have read recently are by Ganguly and Siddhartha Vaidyanathan questioning the lack of spirit and fight shown by the team. What's most surprising to me is that some people seem to think that the team (which was ranked #1 till recently and won the World Cup less than a year back) is suddenly a pile of dung. This when there are still several pieces of information (numbers of course) that have either been ignored or not analysed clearly at all. So here's an attempt to balance the books a little. Consider the following - 1) India's overseas record in 5 year segments roughly over the last two decades is as below: 199

Kohli's team on the way to greatness?

Growing up (from a cricket watching perspective) in the 1990s, I am terribly unused to Test cricket being the format in which the Indian team is most successful and looking like potential world-beaters. Still early days, but this is exactly the way things seem headed currently for Kohli and his men. Since Jan 2015 (when Kohli took over as full time captain), India's record reads: P 21, W 14, L 1, D 6. The absurd W/L ratio will of course not last and many critics will point to the fact that most of the victories have come at home. Teams can however only overcome the opposition they are faced with and so far India have ticked off the overseas boxes they have been faced with (in Sri Lanka and the West Indies). And at home they have been utterly dominant, destroying everyone they've met. But most hearteningly, it's the way they have battled back from adversity that builds the most promise for the future. Too often in even the recent past (let alone the 1990s), Indian teams

Old dog, new tricks?

After Virat Kohli's stupendously successful start as India captain (admittedly in a different format), the cries for Dhoni to be replaced as captain for the shorter formats will undoubtedly renew again. And while Kohli might be ready to take over, I think India still have a lot to gain from Dhoni the batsman and captain at the Champions Trophy in England next year. Aside from the fact that we are not exactly rolling in good new limited overs keeper-batsmen and couldn't therefore find an adequate replacement at short notice, Dhoni has looked fitter and fresher since he gave up Test cricket. He has also, in a distinct departure from the recent past, looked keen to get stuck into situations tactically and work out ways to win with newer players. The Zimbabwe tour was a pretty light weight test but it definitely started there and its carried on into the current series against New Zealand. Most hearteningly, he has not been stubborn about his own waning skills as a batsman and