Skip to main content

A thrilling contest beckons

So after all the many weeks of hype, the first Test between India and Australia starts in a week's time. Its been a while since I saw some quality cricket on TV so am definitely looking forward to it.

In terms of the two teams, I think they are more evenly matched than ever in the recent past which makes picking a winner incredibly hard. And interestingly, the gap has been closed because the Indian bowling attack's stronger than its been in a while and the Aussie one has grown weaker at the same time. Brett Lee's form will probably be one of the deciding factors of the series as will Harbhajan's. To me they are the key bowlers on either side with the rest having to provide strong, steady support.

As for the batting, the pressure will certainly be on the Indian veterans and I for one think that they'll be up to the task and surprise a few people. Dravid is my bet to perform the best amongst the four but I think they'll all come through ok. The key for India in the batting though will be Sehwag and Dhoni, mainly because of their ability to collar attacks on desi pitches. And the fact that the two of them flank the veterans in the middle. If they do well, India will be favourites.

Hayden and Ponting will of course get the most attention amongst the Australian batters but in my opinion, the key players for them will be Mike Hussey and Simon Katich because they can bat patiently for long periods. I'm hoping that Katich gets to open the batting ahead of Jaques (though is Australia don't make that change, as an Indian supporter I won't be complaining ;-)).

All in all, it should be 15-20 days of enthralling cricket (the only downside being that Aruna's probably going to get bored out of her mind with me going on about the game all the time!! :-))

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...