Skip to main content

IPL take 2 - some initial thoughts

Not at the half-way stage but there's been enough going on at the second edition of the IPL to warrant a post. The quality of cricket has been better than the last time around so far, mainly because bowlers have had more of a chance to show their skills. The success of the spinners especially is a pleasant surprise though they will probably find conditions less responsive in England come the World T20.

So far, Deccan, Delhi and Mumbai look the best bets to carry on and lift the trophy but its early days yet and things can change rapidly. In fact, that is the main appeal of T20 for me, the fact that momentum can shift so suddenly and how players deal with it is the key to winning matches. The other very interesting phenomenon has been how the 30+ batsmen seem hell-bent on proving that its not just a young man's game. A quick look at the top batting/bowling stats so far tells an interesting story. None of the top five scorers are below 34 and only three of the top 10 are below 30 (Bopara, deVilliers and Rohit Sharma). The bowling stats are almost the exact opposite, with none of the top five wicket-takers being above 30 and only four of the top 10 above 30 (Vettori barely so).  Again, I'm sure things will change on both tables but experience has an immense role to play in this format, especially in the batting.

Will try and pull together some interesting stats at the end of the tournament. Have said that before but this time hopefully, I'll actually produce something worthwhile! :-)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...