Skip to main content

Diffidence and the English cricket team

The ebbs and flows of the 2009 Ashes have been very interesting to follow, even for a neutral observer like myself. And for once I found myself totally neutral at the beginning of the series, probably mainly because I haven't seen a lot of the people involved play enough to have strong associations/preferences.

Its been absorbing to watch so far even if both sides have been quite inconsistent with the quality of their cricket. The one thing that does continue to separate the two teams (and indeed the Aussies from most teams on a consistent basis) is the mental strength and temperament that the players exhibit. Any team that has had to deal with the retirements of players like Warne, Gilchrist, McGrath, Hayden, Langer, Martyn, Gillespie and MacGill in the space of two years would struggle enormously and so its to their great credit that Australia continue to perform so competitively. And a large part of it is down to belief and mental strength. The Aussies believe they are good and play that way.

The English on the other hand are almost the exact opposite. They seem to play more on hope than belief and struggle (panic almost) at the first sign of things going wrong. Talent and skill wise there's probably not too much to differentiate the two sides and for once the English team is probably more experienced than the Australians (with only three players with less than 20 Tests compared to five for the latter in the Headingley Test). You wouldn't know it by the way they play though. Take the bowling attack for example. Anderson, Harmison, and Onions are probably as talented as Hilfenhaus, Siddle and Clark (on a like for like basis) and the first two Englishmen much more experienced as well but if you had to pick a combined team, I wouldn't pick any of them. The batting is no different. Bopara, Bell and Collingwood are on paper a good like for like match for North, Clarke, and Hussey but would any of the Englishmen get picked in a combined XI? Bell and Clarke are a good case in point (since North and Bopara are both quite new and Hussey and Collingwood are both fighters going through a bad patch). They're both a similar age, made their debuts in 2004 and have played a similar number of matches (48 and 51 respectively). But there ends the similarity. Clarke is now easily Australia's best batsman after Ponting, whereas Bell would struggle to make it to a first XI if all players are available. Clarke averages over 50 against Eng, SA, and NZ (and close to 50 against Ind), Bell averages over 50 only against Pak and Ban. The difference though is clearly not one of skill but more of mind and belief.

Diffidence is the word that comes to my mind when I watch the Englishmen play. And I think Justin Langer said it right. Its in the English psyche to be diffident and not enjoy pressure. They do not like being pushed and tested. A nice cup of tea seems preferable to a hot, sweaty session of fierce battle (with some exceptions such as Flintoff and Swann). They didn't always used to be like this though so maybe there's hope. I for one will not hold my breath though :-)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...