Skip to main content

Yusuf, Raina could do with some competition

As has been written about quite a bit, the Champions Trophy showed up India's bench strength quite starkly. In the absence of Yuvraj, Sehwag, and Zaheer and with Ishant and Harbhajan being so off-colour, the second rung couldn't quite pull together a single performance worthy of a world-beating side. Both the batting and bowling are to blame but I think the former has not got as much attention as it merits because the bowling was so dreadful.

An initial look at the potential line-up for the 2011 World Cup would suggest Tendulkar (assuming he's fit and still around), Sehwag, Gambhir, Yuvraj, and Dhoni as certainties. A strong batting line-up that but very often, the difference in crunch games comes from who's at 6 and 7. Suresh Raina and Yusuf Pathan currently occupy those spots but neither of them have made too much of their chances there. Raina averages 35 after 71 matches and while those are not bad figures, he has not played a match-winning hand often enough from that position. Virat Kohli averages over 42 (albeit after only 9 games) but also over 50 in domestic 50-over games. Similarly, Yusuf Pathan averages a little over 20 after 30 matches and picks up a wicket only every other game on average. His fielding too is not really upto scratch and it is a pity that Ravindra Jadeja hasn't been picked more often for a similar role. Yusuf would be one of the first names on my team-sheet for a T20 tournament but 50-over cricket requires a more adaptable temperament and Jadeja seems a likelier candidate for that role.

The Australia series represents a good chance to have a closer look at Kohli and Jadeja and to see if they have "the right stuff". Lets hope the selectors are bold enough to go that way.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...
2 comments
Read more

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...
Post a Comment
Read more