Skip to main content

The first analysis - 50+ Frequencies

So I've finally gotten down to doing some real statistical analysis. I will start out with Test cricket because that's the form of the game I find most fascinating. And (as most cricket lovers seem to be) being biased towards batsmen, my first few pieces will probably revolve around batting :-)

I should also mention how indebted I am to Cricinfo's "godsend-to-geeks" Statsguru. Its probably what I devote the maximum number of my daily internet pageviews to, sometimes even more than email! Without it, most of the analysis I have ever done would not have been possible.

So first up, I thought it would be worth looking at a simple stat that's slightly different from the more traditional batting average or its second cousin, runs per innings. There's a lot of analysis that's been done around number of innings per 100 but not for the number of innings per 50+ score. A look at that stat (using a minimum of twenty 50+scores) reveals some interesting facts. Bradman of course is at the top as the only man with a sub 2.00 figure. The rest of the top ten has some expected names such as Hobbs, Sutcliffe, Barrington, Weekes, Walcott, Richards, and Ponting. One major surprise is to see Saeed Anwar at #6. Doug Walters as the third Aussie in the top ten and ahead of Ponting will also probably raise a few eyebrows. Amongst other masters of all time, Sobers is at 31, Gavaskar at 17, Hutton at 11, Kallis at 13, Greg Chappell at 19, Tendulkar at 20, Lara at 28, Miandad at 32, Border at 36. Its also interesting that apart from Ponting, most of the other Aussie greats of the modern era are ranked below 50.

As for the bottom 10, as can be expected, its largely made up of wicketkeepers and allrounders. The only specialist batsmen are the Aussie opener Graeme Wood, and two Zimbabweans, Campbell and Grant Flower. The bottom ten are also the only ones at the time of writing with a 5.00+ score. The full list of all 176 players is here. (note: these numbers are as of the end of the 2nd Test between Ind and SL, the 1st Test between NZ and Pak, and the 1st Test between Aus and WI in the 2009-2010 season).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...
Post a Comment
Read more