Skip to main content

The never-ending tournament kicks off

In five days time, what is probably the most bloated world championship in a global sport will kick off. The ICC doesn't seem to have learnt lessons from 2007 and this next edition of the cricket World Cup will probably end up being as tedious as the previous one. Hopefully there will be enough upsets to keep things somewhat interesting over the first 42 matches before the quarter-finals. 42 may not seem like that many considering that the football world cup has 48 before a round of 16. But considering how wide the net of football is spread, that's appropriate. But 42 matches for a sport that only 10 countries play seriously and another half-dozen try to play seriously is absurd, to say the least. Bloating averages and causing more injuries is all it will achieve worst case and best case, we might have Bangladesh reach the quarter finals. Pity that Afghanistan could not make it amongst the minnows, they would have definitely been worth watching more than Canada or the Netherlands.

On the plus side, the fact that most of the top teams are relatively evenly matched and there is no clear favourite means that come the knockout stages things should get quite exciting. That plus how teams deal with the UDRS and the Batting powerplay will be my main points of interest. Let the tosses (and Dhoni losing them promptly ;)) begin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?