Skip to main content

The never-ending tournament kicks off

In five days time, what is probably the most bloated world championship in a global sport will kick off. The ICC doesn't seem to have learnt lessons from 2007 and this next edition of the cricket World Cup will probably end up being as tedious as the previous one. Hopefully there will be enough upsets to keep things somewhat interesting over the first 42 matches before the quarter-finals. 42 may not seem like that many considering that the football world cup has 48 before a round of 16. But considering how wide the net of football is spread, that's appropriate. But 42 matches for a sport that only 10 countries play seriously and another half-dozen try to play seriously is absurd, to say the least. Bloating averages and causing more injuries is all it will achieve worst case and best case, we might have Bangladesh reach the quarter finals. Pity that Afghanistan could not make it amongst the minnows, they would have definitely been worth watching more than Canada or the Netherlands.

On the plus side, the fact that most of the top teams are relatively evenly matched and there is no clear favourite means that come the knockout stages things should get quite exciting. That plus how teams deal with the UDRS and the Batting powerplay will be my main points of interest. Let the tosses (and Dhoni losing them promptly ;)) begin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...