Skip to main content

The surprises continue

We're just past the halfway stage of the tournament and I have to again echo the sentiment of my last (World Cup related) post. Compared to 2007, the level of play has been much more exciting at least if not qualitatively better. Today's final 6 over burst from NZ was a perfect example. In all likelihood the result won't make any difference (except maybe to standings and thereby who the teams play in the quarters) but nevertheless the quality of hitting was astonishing. Flat pitches, small grounds are all fine but the ball still has to be hit and the consistency with which modern day players manage to do so is mind-boggling at times. The Eng-SA game over the weekend was also much fun with Anderson bowling one of the best spells I've seen in a one-day in recent times. The unpredictability too has been great to watch with performances from all manner of players. If someone had predicted that at the halfway stage Andrew Strauss and Shahid Afridi would be at the top of the runs and wickets charts, they would have made a killing. The bowlers list in particular makes for very heartening reading and Afridi has been a real revelation as this article lays out.

I on the other hand am not making a killing so far with my fantasy team. My excuse is that I haven't made the right changes at the right time, the perfect rote excuse all selectors make ;-) At least I've hauled my way past a couple of the Cricinfo Star Wars league and hopefully I'll be near the top as the tournament draws to a close. The one blight on an otherwise fun tournament (no its not the UDRS) has been the number of injuries that have gone on even during the tournament. Hopefully there'll be no more casualties. It'll be a pity if injuries result in one of the quarter finals being a mismatch since we seem to be in line for one of the more evenly contested knock-out phases in recent memory.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...