Skip to main content

The battle for numero uno

Much like the world of men's tennis, the battle for #1 status in Test match cricket is well and truly on. And the two biggest contenders in India and England take on each other in what should be a fascinating series (weather permitting of course as always in blighty ;-)). The South Africans would probably object to this but I think that at the moment they are in the position that Federer is, i.e. will always be there and thereabouts but unable to make the final push. Primarily I think their problem is the lack of a reliable third seamer (India and England have that problem too to some degree) but more importantly (at least until Imran Tahir proves himself capable or otherwise) the lack of a world class spinner. At full strength, the top 6 batters of all three teams are probably on par, with India maybe a notch ahead simply by dint of the wealth of experience in all conditions.

Ironically, its the batting (and the fact that India will not be at full strength for at least half the series) that might be a pivotal factor. For once I agree with Ian Chappell in that the absence of Virender Sehwag will be felt strongly and is probably the main thing (apart from home conditions) that tips the scales slightly in favour of the English. India are the incumbent no.1 and the pressure will be on them to prove that they can compete well even without their best opener since Gavaskar. Given all that he has achieved as captain, a win here will seal Dhoni's reputation as India's best skipper ever (especially if he can follow that up with a win in Australia later in the season). He will have to be at his best though as will the rest of the team as they take on a in-form side at home.

How closely the teams are matched can be seen from the uncanny similarities in the likely line-ups and the averages over the last year and a half or so. Both teams have two left-handed openers (Strauss/Cook and Gambhir/Mukund till Sehwag arrives). They are followed by two classical Test match grafters/pressure absorbers (Trott and Dravid), the champions (Pietersen and Tendulkar), the stylists (Bell and Laxman), and the left-handed "limited overs specialists" (Morgan and Raina). The bowling line-ups too compare well with the two best swing bowlers in the world (Zaheer and Anderson) leading the attacks backed up by tall seamers and honest toilers (Ishant/one of Praveen/Sreesanth and Tremlett/one of Broad/Bresnan). The two best off-spinners (Harbhajan and Swann) and attacking wicket-keeper batsmen (Dhoni and Prior) in the world round things off. The crucial difference though will probably be the experience and class of Strauss over the rawness of Mukund till Sehwag arrives. If the openers can give India consistent starts then England will find the going tough so how young Mukund deals with Anderson and Tremlett (especially at Lord's) will be critical. Its probably unfair to heap that much pressure on a 21 year old who will be playing only his fourth Test but then life's unfair.

All in all, its too close to call but if I were a betting man, my money would be on England to edge it 2-1 given Zaheer's slightly dodgy fitness record, and Sehwag's late arrival. Regardless of outcome though, can't wait for the series to start and for my first four days of live Test match cricket in England :-)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...