Skip to main content

The trouble with India

So far this India-England series or 'the battle for #1' as most people (myself included) had billed it hasn't quite been the Hitchcockian thriller that it was expected to be. And though a lot has been said and written about it, the primary reason in my opinion is that England have been fitter, hungrier and more disciplined (with both bat and ball). Form is something that most sportspersons cannot really control but fitness and strength is something they can and as Sanjay Manjrekar points out in this incisive article, hiding behind injuries is not something a team aspiring to be the world's best should do. Given his fitness record and athleticism levels, this piece from Ganguly is a bit rich, but the point he makes is nevertheless a pertinent one. In my opinion, fitness (or the lack of it) is a broader cultural phenomenon and until there is a distinct change there, its hard to see how any Indian team could consistently be the best in the world.

Of more immediate concern I think is that even in terms of basic cricketing talent there don't seem to be enough players who have shown the ability to fill in the slots that will (soon) be vacated by Dravid, Tendulkar, Laxman, Zaheer, and Harbhajan. Leaving aside Sehwag and Gambhir (who will hopefully be around at least for the next 4-5 years), none of the batsmen who have played since 2006 have been able to cement a position in the first XI. Kaif and Jaffer were dropped for reasons unknown and are now on the wrong side of 30, Yuvraj continues to blow his chances and the younger lot (Vijay, Pujara, Badrinath, Raina, Mukund, Karthik, Kohli) have struggled so far. The stats on the bowling front are not much rosier and you would have to say that purely in bowling terms, India would rate well below both England and South Africa, particularly the former. Ishant and Sreesanth can still be world beaters but they are young and need support. To me, the most worrying aspect of the bowling stocks is that no challenger for Harbhajan has emerged and for a country that used to open the bowling with spinners at times, we struggle to find one or two Test class bowlers. Given this, Ian Chappell is spot on in his assessment that its actually huge credit to Dhoni's management of resources that India held on to the #1 ranking for so long and the fact that they are on the verge of losing it should not really be a surprise. This series has given the team a glimpse into the future and hopefully (if Test cricket remains a priority once the #1 ranking goes), there will be some lessons learnt. The next 18 months will be fascinating viewing for how the team handles the transition.

In the meantime, Salil Tripathi has written the most sensible article I have read in a while on the series and the average Indian cricket fan's perspective (or the lack of it :-)) To paraphrase Docomo's annoying tagline (mouthed even more annoyingly by Ranbir Kapoor), "its just a game, silly".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

The Predictions..

So the time has come, a day late actually since I was supposed to put these in last night. Anyways, today's games have not changed my predictions so I can honestly say that I did not cheat :-) After a fairly pedestrian first round-robin phase, the tournament has finally kicked off and the ensuing games will hopefully see cricket of a much higher quality. My final four would be South Africa, India, Sri Lanka and New Zealand and an India-South Africa final would be a dream. Pakistan and the West Indies are certainly capable of causing an upset or two but I don't see them sneaking in. England and Ireland should draw up the rear which is a bit of a pity given that its on their home turf (or at least the former's). Its interesting how in cricket, home turf never seems to provide much advantage when it comes to big tournaments. Football is almost the exact opposite and on the face of it, that seems so counter-intuitive. There must be a sports psychology explanation of some sort. ...