Skip to main content

The trouble with India

So far this India-England series or 'the battle for #1' as most people (myself included) had billed it hasn't quite been the Hitchcockian thriller that it was expected to be. And though a lot has been said and written about it, the primary reason in my opinion is that England have been fitter, hungrier and more disciplined (with both bat and ball). Form is something that most sportspersons cannot really control but fitness and strength is something they can and as Sanjay Manjrekar points out in this incisive article, hiding behind injuries is not something a team aspiring to be the world's best should do. Given his fitness record and athleticism levels, this piece from Ganguly is a bit rich, but the point he makes is nevertheless a pertinent one. In my opinion, fitness (or the lack of it) is a broader cultural phenomenon and until there is a distinct change there, its hard to see how any Indian team could consistently be the best in the world.

Of more immediate concern I think is that even in terms of basic cricketing talent there don't seem to be enough players who have shown the ability to fill in the slots that will (soon) be vacated by Dravid, Tendulkar, Laxman, Zaheer, and Harbhajan. Leaving aside Sehwag and Gambhir (who will hopefully be around at least for the next 4-5 years), none of the batsmen who have played since 2006 have been able to cement a position in the first XI. Kaif and Jaffer were dropped for reasons unknown and are now on the wrong side of 30, Yuvraj continues to blow his chances and the younger lot (Vijay, Pujara, Badrinath, Raina, Mukund, Karthik, Kohli) have struggled so far. The stats on the bowling front are not much rosier and you would have to say that purely in bowling terms, India would rate well below both England and South Africa, particularly the former. Ishant and Sreesanth can still be world beaters but they are young and need support. To me, the most worrying aspect of the bowling stocks is that no challenger for Harbhajan has emerged and for a country that used to open the bowling with spinners at times, we struggle to find one or two Test class bowlers. Given this, Ian Chappell is spot on in his assessment that its actually huge credit to Dhoni's management of resources that India held on to the #1 ranking for so long and the fact that they are on the verge of losing it should not really be a surprise. This series has given the team a glimpse into the future and hopefully (if Test cricket remains a priority once the #1 ranking goes), there will be some lessons learnt. The next 18 months will be fascinating viewing for how the team handles the transition.

In the meantime, Salil Tripathi has written the most sensible article I have read in a while on the series and the average Indian cricket fan's perspective (or the lack of it :-)) To paraphrase Docomo's annoying tagline (mouthed even more annoyingly by Ranbir Kapoor), "its just a game, silly".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...