Skip to main content

A few good "nearly" men

When it comes to cricketers, I have always had a secret soft spot for those that may not be the most gifted but are really disciplined and work really hard to make the most of their abilities. The perseverance does not necessarily pay off in the most handsome fashion for all of them and many remain relative journeymen when it comes to achievements on the international stage. Its heartening therefore when such men make it to the pinnacle of domestic cricket as captains of national championship winning teams.

Cool is not quite the word I used to associate with Hrishikesh Kanitkar during his brief stint with the national team but he always came across as a man with quiet resolve and steely determination. A first class average of 53+ is pretty special and if India hadn't been blessed with their best middle order line-up ever in the 2000s, then he would have definitely played more than the two Test matches he got. Much the same can be said of Mohammad Kaif who in a parallel universe would probably have been Dravid's successor both as the #3 batsman and captain of India but a mixture of a crowded middle order, poor selection, and plain bad luck means that Kaif will forever be known as India's best fielder and a game trier. That despite their international disappointments, both Kanitkar and Kaif were able to take relatively unfashionable Ranji trophy sides in Rajasthan and UP to multiple Ranji finals and win (twice in the former's case) is a solid achievement testament to the mental strength and character of both men.

Mental strength and character is something that's no stranger for Wasim Jaffer either. In some ways, he had a heavier burden than the other two men given that he came from the Bombay school of cricket and was therefore expected to do well at the Ranji and international level. He probably did not make the most of his chances but was quite competent and remains one of the few Indian openers to have scored a double hundred outside the subcontinent. His domestic record is of course stellar though it serves as an example of the gulf that remains (and is possibly widening) between Indian domestic cricket and Test match ability.

There's many more such examples of yeoman domestic champions from other countries even just during the time I've been following cricket (Stuart Law, Glen Chapple, Daren Ganga all come to mind). But more on them some other time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...