Skip to main content

A few good "nearly" men

When it comes to cricketers, I have always had a secret soft spot for those that may not be the most gifted but are really disciplined and work really hard to make the most of their abilities. The perseverance does not necessarily pay off in the most handsome fashion for all of them and many remain relative journeymen when it comes to achievements on the international stage. Its heartening therefore when such men make it to the pinnacle of domestic cricket as captains of national championship winning teams.

Cool is not quite the word I used to associate with Hrishikesh Kanitkar during his brief stint with the national team but he always came across as a man with quiet resolve and steely determination. A first class average of 53+ is pretty special and if India hadn't been blessed with their best middle order line-up ever in the 2000s, then he would have definitely played more than the two Test matches he got. Much the same can be said of Mohammad Kaif who in a parallel universe would probably have been Dravid's successor both as the #3 batsman and captain of India but a mixture of a crowded middle order, poor selection, and plain bad luck means that Kaif will forever be known as India's best fielder and a game trier. That despite their international disappointments, both Kanitkar and Kaif were able to take relatively unfashionable Ranji trophy sides in Rajasthan and UP to multiple Ranji finals and win (twice in the former's case) is a solid achievement testament to the mental strength and character of both men.

Mental strength and character is something that's no stranger for Wasim Jaffer either. In some ways, he had a heavier burden than the other two men given that he came from the Bombay school of cricket and was therefore expected to do well at the Ranji and international level. He probably did not make the most of his chances but was quite competent and remains one of the few Indian openers to have scored a double hundred outside the subcontinent. His domestic record is of course stellar though it serves as an example of the gulf that remains (and is possibly widening) between Indian domestic cricket and Test match ability.

There's many more such examples of yeoman domestic champions from other countries even just during the time I've been following cricket (Stuart Law, Glen Chapple, Daren Ganga all come to mind). But more on them some other time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...