Skip to main content

In defence of Ishant Sharma

For me, one of the few heartening aspects of the disastrous Indian tours of England and Australia in their respective summers has been to see Ishant Sharma bowling his last over of the day with the same gusto as his first, irrespective of whether the opposition have been at 30-3 or 300-3. In a team that's generally looked dispirited all too easily, one of the youngest members has a lesson to teach the others - don't stop trying no matter how well or badly you are doing.

Granted that since the second Test against England (at Nottingham) he has done poorly picking up just 11 wickets in eight matches but in his last nine matches prior to that he picked up no less than 45 scalps. And if the top five batsmen with all their experience are allowed so much leeway, shouldn't Ishant who's just a little over 23, deserve some too? Sample some other stats -

1) If you look at bowling records for players upto the age of 23, Ishant is the sixth highest wicket taker of all time. With a poor average undoubtedly but he's featured in some of the weakest attacks on very flat pitches and yet has a strike rate better than three of the top 10. Restricting to pace bowlers only puts him at third and (just as a comparison) Stuart Broad is ninth on that list. A similar bowler to Ishant, it took Broad some time to find consistency and England were patient with him and look where he is today. Ditto Craig McDermott.

2) Closer home, comparing Ishant to his closest competitors for a spot in the Indian Test match XI (who've played at least five games), none of his rivals (obviously excluding Zaheer) take significantly more wickets per match, have better averages, or strike rates. PK and Umesh Yadav have shown promise but who knows for how long? And at the very least (unlike Sreesanth, Irfan, RP, or Munaf), Sharma doesn't keep breaking down every so often with an injury.

3) Outside of Test matches, Ishant has played just 22 first class games where his record is not that different indicating that he has been learning his art on the international stage which is never easy. Zaheer Khan's stats post his county stint are testament to what first class experience in different conditions can do for an Indian bowler so its a mystery why more Indian quicks haven't taken that path.

In summary, it would be nice if the media left Ishant alone instead of writing pieces like this one and this one. Encouragement and support is what the lad needs, not questioning his calibre.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

The final elusive pieces

Now that Mahendra Singh Dhoni has essentially announced his decision to stay on as skipper of the side till at least the 2015 World Cup, every ODI series India plays hereon is a stage for defining the plans and alternatives for that tournament. And none of them will be more critical than the current series against New Zealand given its the closest the team will get to play in conditions resembling that in the actual World Cup. A lot gets written about India's poor record in Test cricket away from home even though its improved hugely since the turn of the millennium. Their one-day record away from home is not outstanding either with a win-loss ratio well below 1 (though only Australia and South Africa are better). What is more concerning is the fact that Australia and New Zealand are two of the three worst venues for the team thereby making the title defence even more challenging. Their recent record and especially the win in the Champions Trophy certainly gives cause for hope ...