Skip to main content

In defence of Ishant Sharma

For me, one of the few heartening aspects of the disastrous Indian tours of England and Australia in their respective summers has been to see Ishant Sharma bowling his last over of the day with the same gusto as his first, irrespective of whether the opposition have been at 30-3 or 300-3. In a team that's generally looked dispirited all too easily, one of the youngest members has a lesson to teach the others - don't stop trying no matter how well or badly you are doing.

Granted that since the second Test against England (at Nottingham) he has done poorly picking up just 11 wickets in eight matches but in his last nine matches prior to that he picked up no less than 45 scalps. And if the top five batsmen with all their experience are allowed so much leeway, shouldn't Ishant who's just a little over 23, deserve some too? Sample some other stats -

1) If you look at bowling records for players upto the age of 23, Ishant is the sixth highest wicket taker of all time. With a poor average undoubtedly but he's featured in some of the weakest attacks on very flat pitches and yet has a strike rate better than three of the top 10. Restricting to pace bowlers only puts him at third and (just as a comparison) Stuart Broad is ninth on that list. A similar bowler to Ishant, it took Broad some time to find consistency and England were patient with him and look where he is today. Ditto Craig McDermott.

2) Closer home, comparing Ishant to his closest competitors for a spot in the Indian Test match XI (who've played at least five games), none of his rivals (obviously excluding Zaheer) take significantly more wickets per match, have better averages, or strike rates. PK and Umesh Yadav have shown promise but who knows for how long? And at the very least (unlike Sreesanth, Irfan, RP, or Munaf), Sharma doesn't keep breaking down every so often with an injury.

3) Outside of Test matches, Ishant has played just 22 first class games where his record is not that different indicating that he has been learning his art on the international stage which is never easy. Zaheer Khan's stats post his county stint are testament to what first class experience in different conditions can do for an Indian bowler so its a mystery why more Indian quicks haven't taken that path.

In summary, it would be nice if the media left Ishant alone instead of writing pieces like this one and this one. Encouragement and support is what the lad needs, not questioning his calibre.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...