Skip to main content

In defence of Ishant Sharma

For me, one of the few heartening aspects of the disastrous Indian tours of England and Australia in their respective summers has been to see Ishant Sharma bowling his last over of the day with the same gusto as his first, irrespective of whether the opposition have been at 30-3 or 300-3. In a team that's generally looked dispirited all too easily, one of the youngest members has a lesson to teach the others - don't stop trying no matter how well or badly you are doing.

Granted that since the second Test against England (at Nottingham) he has done poorly picking up just 11 wickets in eight matches but in his last nine matches prior to that he picked up no less than 45 scalps. And if the top five batsmen with all their experience are allowed so much leeway, shouldn't Ishant who's just a little over 23, deserve some too? Sample some other stats -

1) If you look at bowling records for players upto the age of 23, Ishant is the sixth highest wicket taker of all time. With a poor average undoubtedly but he's featured in some of the weakest attacks on very flat pitches and yet has a strike rate better than three of the top 10. Restricting to pace bowlers only puts him at third and (just as a comparison) Stuart Broad is ninth on that list. A similar bowler to Ishant, it took Broad some time to find consistency and England were patient with him and look where he is today. Ditto Craig McDermott.

2) Closer home, comparing Ishant to his closest competitors for a spot in the Indian Test match XI (who've played at least five games), none of his rivals (obviously excluding Zaheer) take significantly more wickets per match, have better averages, or strike rates. PK and Umesh Yadav have shown promise but who knows for how long? And at the very least (unlike Sreesanth, Irfan, RP, or Munaf), Sharma doesn't keep breaking down every so often with an injury.

3) Outside of Test matches, Ishant has played just 22 first class games where his record is not that different indicating that he has been learning his art on the international stage which is never easy. Zaheer Khan's stats post his county stint are testament to what first class experience in different conditions can do for an Indian bowler so its a mystery why more Indian quicks haven't taken that path.

In summary, it would be nice if the media left Ishant alone instead of writing pieces like this one and this one. Encouragement and support is what the lad needs, not questioning his calibre.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...