Skip to main content

Has ODI batting really changed in the last decade?

Apart from the fact that there is a massive overdose of meaningless matches, the reason that I have almost completely tuned out of watching ODI cricket in recent times is that there isn't much variability to the quality of cricket. Its as if each match/series is played from a selection of four or five templates with a pinch of variation here and there. The format has gone completely stagnant and as a viewer/follower its really hard to get excited about most contests. Sport is at its best when three ingredients come together - 1) A sense of occasion/context (which is why marquee Test match series, the football World Cup, and the Grand Slams in tennis are always worth following), 2) A battle (preferably equal) of both skills and wills, and 3) An ever increasing quality quotient. The third aspect is probably the hardest in cricket (and in football) given that so much of the game depends on individual ability (as opposed to technology which makes comparisons across eras in say tennis, nigh on impossible). Nevertheless, the least that can be hoped for is that stagnation is held at bay. And in ODI cricket (particularly in batting), we seem to be nearing that precipice.

Sample the stats below from the last ten years (2002-2011) -


The above spans across a period covering three World Cups and so it would be reasonable to expect that the game has moved along in terms of the impact batsmen are having? The stats however present a different picture. All of the stats above covering quantity of runs scored, frequency of significant individual scores, proportion of big scoring shots, and overall scoring rates, are pretty much static. To paraphrase Shane Warne's cheeky comment about Panesar, its as if the same match has been played 1442 times. Not quite but you can see what I meant earlier about the format going stagnant. And while its true that numbers will not always tell the full story of how playing styles and strategies have evolved, they cannot be said to be completely misleading either.

The one heartening statistic though from the last two years is that we seeming to be heading back to a period of a healthier mix of classic Test match batsmen tasting limited overs success. The list of top batsmen (by batting average) who scored more than 1000 runs since Jan 2010 includes Amla, Cook, Trott, Misbah, and Strauss in the top ten. And neither Michael Clarke nor Jacques Kallis would feature in most people's list of "ODI-batsmen-I-would-pay-money-to-watch". Moreover, Amla, Cook, and Strauss are all striking at well over 90 runs/ 100 balls so even the usual complaint of sluggish scoring can't be lodged. Comparing this with the previous two year period where Chanderpaul was probably the only member of the top ten (Kallis again and possibly Salman Butt in a stretch case) who can be put down as a true old-fashioned Test match batter. The likes of Amla and Cook have proved that its not about style and appearances but the willingness to adapt thinking and following it up with the hard work that counts. More power to them and here's hoping its not a false dawn.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...
2 comments
Read more

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...
Post a Comment
Read more