Skip to main content

The professionalism gap

The gulf between this Indian side and their hosts over the last seven weeks or so has been quite significant (on average) from a cricketing perspective but two events from this past week highlight how big the gap is even off the field.

First, Dhoni's suspension for one game (for slow over-rates). Its hard to imagine the Australian team management (coach, selectors etc) allowing their captain to get suspended for the second time on a single tour. I'm a big fan of Dhoni's (despite all the flak he's copped this tour) but even an immensely capable man like him occasionally needs some guidance and support. And here, Fletcher hasn't had a single thing to say about it (more or less like his silence on the rest of the tour). Its surely not a coincidence that both the transgressions have come when India have chosen to play four seamers, so its not as though the solution is hard to find (even setting aside the tactical questionability of that team composition). Hopefully, someone (ideally Fletcher) is having a word with Dhoni behind the scenes.

Behind the scenes intrigue is something that needs to be avoided when it comes to the issue of the retirement of senior pros clearly past their best. Its refreshing to see the openness that John Inverarity has when it comes to explaining decisions and the agreement that he and Ponting had is how mature adult professionals should operate. The contrast with the Indian selectors is glaring whereby Kris Srikkanth has never bothered to indicate where Tendulkar, Dravid, and Laxman stand in the selectors thinking. Again (as in the case above with Dhoni), hopefully there's more going on privately than has been revealed to the masses. Judging by how Dravid had to force the issue when it came to his ODI career, its unlikely that there's any real plan that Srikkanth and co have.

Cricketing gaps can be made up to some extent with hard work on and off the field. How do you cope with attitude gaps though?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...