Skip to main content

The under-rated Dhoni

An edited version of this piece was published on ESPNcricinfo here.

Given that he's the most celebrated cricketer India has had (with the possible exception of Tendulkar), feels a bit strange to say that Dhoni's under-rated but I feel compelled to say that he's not given due credit for his achievements as a Test match wicketkeeper-batsman. Partly, I think its his excellence as an ODI cricketer (second highest batting average amongst all players with 4000+runs) that overshadows his achievements in the Test arena. And partly the fact that he looks somewhat ungainly (both as a keeper and a batsman), and for some unfathomable reason most people have the view that great Test match players need to be elegant/graceful. The recent Test match thrashings meted out to his team in England and Australia have given more fodder to his bashers to begin the "Oh but he can't play Test cricket" refrain.

I say, bullshit. Ultimately, there is one currency alone that matters and that is performance on the field and the numbers you rack up/results you deliver. So lets have a look at the stats. Starting off small-scale, there isn't a shred of doubt that Dhoni's been India's best Test match keeper batsmen ever (and he's not finished yet). He has the highest number of dismissals already and at a rate (dismissals/innings) higher than anyone else who's played at least 10 games with only Dinesh Karthik coming close. Also (again for keepers who've played at least 10 matches), his batting average is higher than his closest rival (Budhi Kunderan) by over four runs per innings. And he needs to play only 22 matches more to go past Kirmani's longevity mark as the most tenured Indian stump-man. Going further afield, if you look at top wicket-keepers of all time, Dhoni ranks 9th in terms of overall dismissals and 14th if you look at dismissals/innings (for players who've kept in more than 30 matches). Hugely respectable already, and he's definitely got the opportunity to climb up both metrics (though the latter is probably a bit suspect and more dependent on the chances your bowlers create given that Kamran "can't-catch" Akmal ranks second on that list). Turning to batting, his average is the sixth highest of all time (again for players who've kept in more than 30 matches) and ahead of men like Alec Stewart,  and Brendon McCullum who've played as specialist batsmen at times. Not bad for someone who is considered chiefly a limited overs cricketer in sub-continental conditions.

And all of this is not even looking at the fact that he's captained the side in 37 of his 67 matches and has a win-loss ratio that's the best ever for an Indian captain and the eleventh-best ever for all captains (who've led their side in 35+ games). This without a bowling attack even half as good as that which any of the ten men above him had at their disposal. Heck, he didn't even have Srinath and Kumble (unlike Ganguly who had at least the latter for much of his reign) who are probably India's best modern day pace and spin bowler.

So give the man his due and stop branding him an ODI/T20 champion only. He's as good at the Test match stuff and just needs better support from his team (especially the bowlers) to keep proving it.

p.s.: For those who say he can't score runs in pace-friendly conditions, he averages 39 in England and 31 in South Africa and (a certainly below-par) 19 in Australia. So some ground to make up but nothing disastrous in the least.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...