Skip to main content

MVP of the world?

My first memory of Graeme Swann is his very first over in Test cricket. What. an. over. No matter what happens in the future, no bowler will ever again be able to claim the wickets of both Gautam Gambhir and Rahul Dravid in their first over in Test cricket and its unlikely that too many will claim two wickets of any kind. My imagination was captured that day and has been since and Swann has repaid the faith shown in him (first by Moores/Pietersen and then by Flower/Strauss) in spades.

Being named England's winter MVP was fitting reward and if you ask me, Swann is currently world cricket's MVP (along with Saeed Ajmal). Spin bowling in Test matches has taken a beating (no pun intended) in recent times and a look at the figures since 2010 sums it up nicely. With due respect to both Rangana Herath and Abdur Rehman (both honest, hardworking left-armers but unlikely to be around much longer), Swann and Ajmal stand out like a beacon with their performances and are basically keeping the art alive. And given that Swann is the younger of the two, world cricket needs him to keep going in this vein. Already, he has the third best strike rate ever (for spinners with more than 150 wickets) and the best ever if you exclude matches against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. With Harbhajan and Vettori having declined seemingly beyond repair, and younger blokes like Lyon, Ashwin, and Shakib Al-Hasan still settling in to Test cricket, Swann leads the barest cupboard in Test match cricket at the moment (wicket-keepers are the other category in danger).

Hopefully he'll play a decisive role in leading England to victory over South Africa and keep going from strength to strength!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...