Skip to main content

MVP of the world?

My first memory of Graeme Swann is his very first over in Test cricket. What. an. over. No matter what happens in the future, no bowler will ever again be able to claim the wickets of both Gautam Gambhir and Rahul Dravid in their first over in Test cricket and its unlikely that too many will claim two wickets of any kind. My imagination was captured that day and has been since and Swann has repaid the faith shown in him (first by Moores/Pietersen and then by Flower/Strauss) in spades.

Being named England's winter MVP was fitting reward and if you ask me, Swann is currently world cricket's MVP (along with Saeed Ajmal). Spin bowling in Test matches has taken a beating (no pun intended) in recent times and a look at the figures since 2010 sums it up nicely. With due respect to both Rangana Herath and Abdur Rehman (both honest, hardworking left-armers but unlikely to be around much longer), Swann and Ajmal stand out like a beacon with their performances and are basically keeping the art alive. And given that Swann is the younger of the two, world cricket needs him to keep going in this vein. Already, he has the third best strike rate ever (for spinners with more than 150 wickets) and the best ever if you exclude matches against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. With Harbhajan and Vettori having declined seemingly beyond repair, and younger blokes like Lyon, Ashwin, and Shakib Al-Hasan still settling in to Test cricket, Swann leads the barest cupboard in Test match cricket at the moment (wicket-keepers are the other category in danger).

Hopefully he'll play a decisive role in leading England to victory over South Africa and keep going from strength to strength!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...