Skip to main content

An ode to Zak

Sometime this November (or possibly December), its very likely that Zaheer Khan will pick up his ninth wicket of the series against England and so become only the fourth Indian bowler (and only the second fast bowler) to join the 300+ Test match wicket club. Given that this club is now 24 strong, it may not seem like a big achievement in an all-time context but from an Indian perspective, its massive and MS Dhoni is not over-reaching at all when he says that Zaheer deserves as much acclaim as Tendulkar for his contributions to Indian cricket.

As always, sample the stats first. Amongst the 25 Indian bowlers who have taken 75+ Test match wickets (100 would have been too high a threshold for India), Zaheer has the best strike rate (though admittedly only the 12th best average). And if you then look at away matches only (excl Zim and Ban) and reduce the cut-off to 45 wickets, he continues to be top of the pile in terms of strike rates and behind only Subhash Gupte on bowling average. And finally, he's the highest wicket taker for India in away victories (which is the gold standard for any team). Add to that the fact that he's only 18 wickets away from becoming the twelfth bowler to take 300+ wickets in ODIs. And if he does get past 300 wickets in both formats, he will be only the ninth bowler in the history of the game to do so.

But apart from the stats, there's also the back story of how he's had to deal with so many injuries and comebacks over time. He's gone from being a tearaway (who memorably  to remodelling his action and becoming a cannier bowler in the mould of McGrath, Pollock, and Vaas. And while he may never be as great a bowler as the first two, when he's fit and firing, India look a different team and Dhoni an altogether more attacking captain. Dravid and Laxman will be missed greatly, as will Tendulkar and Sehwag when they retire, but in a land of batsmen and spin bowlers, no one will be missed more in the short term than the genial quick from Shrirampur who's become arguably India's most complete fast bowler ever.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...