Skip to main content

A new era dawns?

Sometime in the next 12-18 months, the greatest batsman I've had the pleasure of watching will call it a day. As a cricket spectator, I know that life for me will not be the same in a world where the familiar face of Sachin Tendulkar does not come out to bat at the fall of the second wicket or the commencement of the Indian innings depending on the format. It will be akin to Bollywood without Amitabh Bachchan and somewhere in me there will be a silent tear shed.

And its not just Tendulkar. His departure will symbolise the closure of the period in which I did most of my cricket watching as an adult (a largely T20 free period thank heaven). A look at the top batsmen and bowlers since the turn of the millenium is instructive. Six of the top 20 batsmen have retired sometime in the last five years and another eight (Ponting, Kallis, Sangakkara, Tendulkar, Jayawardene, Sehwag, Chanderpaul, and Younis Khan) are clearly on their last legs. Smith, Pietersen, Gayle, and Clarke are all 31+ which leaves Cook as the sole under 30 member of that group. The bowlers present an even more dramatic picture. Of the top 20 wicket-takers since 2000, eleven have retired in the last five years (and Kaneria is serving a life ban). Zaheer, Vettori, Martin and Kallis are way past their best and hence not likely to last more than another 12 months or so. Harbhajan will need a miraculous comeback (or a disastrous spell for Ashwin and Ojha) to get to 100 Test matches which leaves just the top two bowlers in the world today, Steyn and Anderson of whom the latter is past 30.

The next generation of stars is still emerging but somehow in a T20 rich world, it is hard to imagine as many young men who will leave an enduring legacy behind as there were in the 90s and noughties. But maybe, I'm just being jaded and cynical. Maybe the Amlas, Kohlis, Wades, Philanders and Roachs of this new era will prove me wrong. I sure hope they do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...