Skip to main content

A new era dawns?

Sometime in the next 12-18 months, the greatest batsman I've had the pleasure of watching will call it a day. As a cricket spectator, I know that life for me will not be the same in a world where the familiar face of Sachin Tendulkar does not come out to bat at the fall of the second wicket or the commencement of the Indian innings depending on the format. It will be akin to Bollywood without Amitabh Bachchan and somewhere in me there will be a silent tear shed.

And its not just Tendulkar. His departure will symbolise the closure of the period in which I did most of my cricket watching as an adult (a largely T20 free period thank heaven). A look at the top batsmen and bowlers since the turn of the millenium is instructive. Six of the top 20 batsmen have retired sometime in the last five years and another eight (Ponting, Kallis, Sangakkara, Tendulkar, Jayawardene, Sehwag, Chanderpaul, and Younis Khan) are clearly on their last legs. Smith, Pietersen, Gayle, and Clarke are all 31+ which leaves Cook as the sole under 30 member of that group. The bowlers present an even more dramatic picture. Of the top 20 wicket-takers since 2000, eleven have retired in the last five years (and Kaneria is serving a life ban). Zaheer, Vettori, Martin and Kallis are way past their best and hence not likely to last more than another 12 months or so. Harbhajan will need a miraculous comeback (or a disastrous spell for Ashwin and Ojha) to get to 100 Test matches which leaves just the top two bowlers in the world today, Steyn and Anderson of whom the latter is past 30.

The next generation of stars is still emerging but somehow in a T20 rich world, it is hard to imagine as many young men who will leave an enduring legacy behind as there were in the 90s and noughties. But maybe, I'm just being jaded and cynical. Maybe the Amlas, Kohlis, Wades, Philanders and Roachs of this new era will prove me wrong. I sure hope they do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...