Skip to main content

A new era dawns?

Sometime in the next 12-18 months, the greatest batsman I've had the pleasure of watching will call it a day. As a cricket spectator, I know that life for me will not be the same in a world where the familiar face of Sachin Tendulkar does not come out to bat at the fall of the second wicket or the commencement of the Indian innings depending on the format. It will be akin to Bollywood without Amitabh Bachchan and somewhere in me there will be a silent tear shed.

And its not just Tendulkar. His departure will symbolise the closure of the period in which I did most of my cricket watching as an adult (a largely T20 free period thank heaven). A look at the top batsmen and bowlers since the turn of the millenium is instructive. Six of the top 20 batsmen have retired sometime in the last five years and another eight (Ponting, Kallis, Sangakkara, Tendulkar, Jayawardene, Sehwag, Chanderpaul, and Younis Khan) are clearly on their last legs. Smith, Pietersen, Gayle, and Clarke are all 31+ which leaves Cook as the sole under 30 member of that group. The bowlers present an even more dramatic picture. Of the top 20 wicket-takers since 2000, eleven have retired in the last five years (and Kaneria is serving a life ban). Zaheer, Vettori, Martin and Kallis are way past their best and hence not likely to last more than another 12 months or so. Harbhajan will need a miraculous comeback (or a disastrous spell for Ashwin and Ojha) to get to 100 Test matches which leaves just the top two bowlers in the world today, Steyn and Anderson of whom the latter is past 30.

The next generation of stars is still emerging but somehow in a T20 rich world, it is hard to imagine as many young men who will leave an enduring legacy behind as there were in the 90s and noughties. But maybe, I'm just being jaded and cynical. Maybe the Amlas, Kohlis, Wades, Philanders and Roachs of this new era will prove me wrong. I sure hope they do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...