Skip to main content

Veeru and Jai no more

Just as the lead characters in what is (arguably) India's best loved movie will remain cherished forever, Sehwag and Gambhir's will go down as India's best ever opening pair in history. The similarities are remarkable to say the least. There is of course the fact that Sehwag's nickname is the same as Dharmendra's character and he's also as easy-going yet destructive as the elder of the duo in the film. In fact, Sehwag's known to whistle/sing Kishore Kumar songs to himself while batting and maybe he sometimes hums one of the tunes that the legendary singer played back for Veeru? Gambhir on the other hand, reflects the same intensity and grit that Bachchan did as Jaidev and is also clearly the more compulsive thinker.

Together they created batting magic for India and (prior to May 2011), for all pairs that had scored more than 2000 runs opening the innings in Test matches, they had the fifth highest average of all-time (and the best post-1968) which is a phenomenal record by any standards. They averaged more than five more runs per innings compared to the next best Indian pair (Gavaskar-Chauhan) and more than two more compared to the next best modern pair (Gooch-Atherton). Since then though its been steadily downhill. Extending the previous list to date drops them down to eighth on the list (and the second-best Indian pair). To add to that, they have not lasted more than 20 overs together since December 2010. They are still second on the all-time ODI list (in terms of averages) for pairs that have scored more than 1500 runs opening the innings. That though masks the fact that they have put on 50 runs or more only thrice in their last 15 attempts.

Their individual records are even more dismal. Since May 2011, Sehwag averages 30.6 in Test matches (with no hundreds), 36.8 in ODIs (which is respectable but goes down to 21.6 when you remove the one freak knock of 219), and 16.2 in T20s (where he hasn't passed 30 once). Gambhir's figures are equally disappointing - 24.4 in Test matches (no hundreds either), 41.8 in ODIs (the one area bucking the trend), and 26.8 in T20s (though he did lead KKR to victory in the IPL). This at a time when the retirement of Dravid and Laxman plus Yuvraj's illness means that these two are the senior batsmen in the side after Tendulkar. To make matters worse, they are not the sprightliest in the field so that means that if they're not making runs, they are hard to keep in the side. Additionally, age is not on Sehwag's side and Gambhir doesn't look likely to become the next captain unless Dhoni suddenly decides to retire from one of the formats.

It'll be interesting to see where the two go from here and if they can turn things around. Sehwag's chances are low if you believe Greg Chappell and Osman Samiuddin's views and I personally find it hard to disagree with them. Gambhir has a better attitude and is also a few years younger so can hopefully stay fit and regain some touch. India can ill-afford to see both of them becoming IPL specialists only.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...