Skip to main content

A punter you could rely on

It took me a long time to warm up to Ricky Ponting as a cricketer. I always admired his batting and the supreme ability he had to be ruthlessly dominating. Of his contemporaries/competitors for best batsmen of the modern era he always looked the most dismissive of bowlers when at his best. Lara was aesthetically pleasing, Kallis and Dravid defied bowlers to remove them from the pitch, and Tendulkar looked supremely confident. But no one played with as much seeming arrogance as the boy from Launceston. And maybe it was this typical Australian arrogance and snarling attitude that made me dislike him initially. Apart from the fact that he spit into his palms too often (or maybe the camera just liked focusing on him when he did that). Or maybe it was that he seemed to reserve his best so often for India (though thankfully not in India itself). His three highest Test innings (and three of his six double hundreds) were made against India and it was his pulverizing innings in the 2003 World Cup final that made the match lopsided. I watched each ball of the first three of those four innings and they left a searing (albeit hugely admiring) impression.

The innings that turned things around for me was his 156 at Old Trafford in the 2005 Ashes. It still counts as probably the best captain's innings that I have watched. Under pressure after England had squared the series and the Aussies were looking fragile for the first time in years, you could see Ponting visibly summon every inch of his mental strength and experience to keep his team afloat. None of his men passed 40 but Ponting battled on and made only his second fourth innings ton into a big one through sheer grit. And I can still recall the expression on his face when he was the ninth wicket to fall with four overs still left to play. Thankfully, Lee and McGrath hung on though Australia couldn't salvage the series which was the beginning of Ponting's misery as captain as he lost two more Ashes series including the first in Australia in nearly 25 years.

That though will not be his legacy. As Dan Brettig points out, most players are considered greats if they play 100 Test matches and Ponting has played in 100 victories. That plus the fact that he is arguably the best Australian batsman after the Don (ie the best human Australian batsman ;-)). Over 13,000 runs, an average of 52+ and 41 hundreds are records that will take some besting. I doubt that the Bard is particularly popular down under but if he were, the talk in pubs after Perth 2012 will be along the lines of "Mate, here was a Caesar! when comes such another?" or whatever the Aussie version of that would be.

Go well at the WACA, Punter and thanks for all the memories (painful or otherwise :-)).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...