Skip to main content

A punter you could rely on

It took me a long time to warm up to Ricky Ponting as a cricketer. I always admired his batting and the supreme ability he had to be ruthlessly dominating. Of his contemporaries/competitors for best batsmen of the modern era he always looked the most dismissive of bowlers when at his best. Lara was aesthetically pleasing, Kallis and Dravid defied bowlers to remove them from the pitch, and Tendulkar looked supremely confident. But no one played with as much seeming arrogance as the boy from Launceston. And maybe it was this typical Australian arrogance and snarling attitude that made me dislike him initially. Apart from the fact that he spit into his palms too often (or maybe the camera just liked focusing on him when he did that). Or maybe it was that he seemed to reserve his best so often for India (though thankfully not in India itself). His three highest Test innings (and three of his six double hundreds) were made against India and it was his pulverizing innings in the 2003 World Cup final that made the match lopsided. I watched each ball of the first three of those four innings and they left a searing (albeit hugely admiring) impression.

The innings that turned things around for me was his 156 at Old Trafford in the 2005 Ashes. It still counts as probably the best captain's innings that I have watched. Under pressure after England had squared the series and the Aussies were looking fragile for the first time in years, you could see Ponting visibly summon every inch of his mental strength and experience to keep his team afloat. None of his men passed 40 but Ponting battled on and made only his second fourth innings ton into a big one through sheer grit. And I can still recall the expression on his face when he was the ninth wicket to fall with four overs still left to play. Thankfully, Lee and McGrath hung on though Australia couldn't salvage the series which was the beginning of Ponting's misery as captain as he lost two more Ashes series including the first in Australia in nearly 25 years.

That though will not be his legacy. As Dan Brettig points out, most players are considered greats if they play 100 Test matches and Ponting has played in 100 victories. That plus the fact that he is arguably the best Australian batsman after the Don (ie the best human Australian batsman ;-)). Over 13,000 runs, an average of 52+ and 41 hundreds are records that will take some besting. I doubt that the Bard is particularly popular down under but if he were, the talk in pubs after Perth 2012 will be along the lines of "Mate, here was a Caesar! when comes such another?" or whatever the Aussie version of that would be.

Go well at the WACA, Punter and thanks for all the memories (painful or otherwise :-)).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...