Skip to main content

A punter you could rely on

It took me a long time to warm up to Ricky Ponting as a cricketer. I always admired his batting and the supreme ability he had to be ruthlessly dominating. Of his contemporaries/competitors for best batsmen of the modern era he always looked the most dismissive of bowlers when at his best. Lara was aesthetically pleasing, Kallis and Dravid defied bowlers to remove them from the pitch, and Tendulkar looked supremely confident. But no one played with as much seeming arrogance as the boy from Launceston. And maybe it was this typical Australian arrogance and snarling attitude that made me dislike him initially. Apart from the fact that he spit into his palms too often (or maybe the camera just liked focusing on him when he did that). Or maybe it was that he seemed to reserve his best so often for India (though thankfully not in India itself). His three highest Test innings (and three of his six double hundreds) were made against India and it was his pulverizing innings in the 2003 World Cup final that made the match lopsided. I watched each ball of the first three of those four innings and they left a searing (albeit hugely admiring) impression.

The innings that turned things around for me was his 156 at Old Trafford in the 2005 Ashes. It still counts as probably the best captain's innings that I have watched. Under pressure after England had squared the series and the Aussies were looking fragile for the first time in years, you could see Ponting visibly summon every inch of his mental strength and experience to keep his team afloat. None of his men passed 40 but Ponting battled on and made only his second fourth innings ton into a big one through sheer grit. And I can still recall the expression on his face when he was the ninth wicket to fall with four overs still left to play. Thankfully, Lee and McGrath hung on though Australia couldn't salvage the series which was the beginning of Ponting's misery as captain as he lost two more Ashes series including the first in Australia in nearly 25 years.

That though will not be his legacy. As Dan Brettig points out, most players are considered greats if they play 100 Test matches and Ponting has played in 100 victories. That plus the fact that he is arguably the best Australian batsman after the Don (ie the best human Australian batsman ;-)). Over 13,000 runs, an average of 52+ and 41 hundreds are records that will take some besting. I doubt that the Bard is particularly popular down under but if he were, the talk in pubs after Perth 2012 will be along the lines of "Mate, here was a Caesar! when comes such another?" or whatever the Aussie version of that would be.

Go well at the WACA, Punter and thanks for all the memories (painful or otherwise :-)).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...

The final elusive pieces

Now that Mahendra Singh Dhoni has essentially announced his decision to stay on as skipper of the side till at least the 2015 World Cup, every ODI series India plays hereon is a stage for defining the plans and alternatives for that tournament. And none of them will be more critical than the current series against New Zealand given its the closest the team will get to play in conditions resembling that in the actual World Cup. A lot gets written about India's poor record in Test cricket away from home even though its improved hugely since the turn of the millennium. Their one-day record away from home is not outstanding either with a win-loss ratio well below 1 (though only Australia and South Africa are better). What is more concerning is the fact that Australia and New Zealand are two of the three worst venues for the team thereby making the title defence even more challenging. Their recent record and especially the win in the Champions Trophy certainly gives cause for hope ...