Skip to main content

The battle for No. 3

Since the decline in Australian domination post 2007, teams appear to have become obsessed with being ranked #1 in Test cricket as though a numerical calculation mattered more than actual results and winning Test matches. The fact that the ranking has changed hands four times in the last five years is almost testament to the fact that teams are driven more by wanting to reach the top spot than on staying there once they make it. Graeme Smith's team will claim that they are the most deserving holders of the mace given their consistency in the last five years plus the fact that they have beaten both Eng and Aus away, and not lost to India in India ie they have outperformed their closest contenders in their home conditions. The truth though is that there is no clear-cut champion at the moment.

What is very clear though is that the upcoming Pataudi Trophy series is a contest to decide third and fourth place. In current form and team circumstances, the teams battling each other down under currently are clearly ahead of England and India. South Africa are still the best all-round unit (ie with the fewest weaknesses) and Australia have a captain who's proving to be inspirational and in the form of his life. Dhoni's men and Cook and co on the other hand are having to rebuild and as Osman Samiuddin puts it, the biggest learning from the series will be how much more rebuilding the losing team will need to do.

Still, a contest between equally flawed teams is often as thrilling as that between equally good ones so I'm eagerly waiting for play to begin in less than six hours time!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...
Post a Comment
Read more

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...
Post a Comment
Read more

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...
Post a Comment
Read more