Skip to main content

A cricketing chapter closes

Its been nearly a month now since Tendulkar announced his retirement from one-day internationals but I don't think its fully sunk in for me that I won't ever see him walk out to open the batting again in the India blues. Even though my first foray into following cricket was the fifty over world cup in 1987, I soon got hooked onto Test match cricket and have never really felt as passionately for the limited overs format since. Since the 1990s, one-day cricket (except World Cups) for me has always been more about following my favourite cricketers and how they perform and Tendulkar has always been in the top three in that list.

The numbers of course are awe-inspiring but what's more staggering is the consistency with which he kept churning them out over such a long period. To average nearly 45 over 463 matches boggles the mind to a degree I wouldn't have imagined possible. 463 matches. In terms of days of cricket, that equates to over 90 Test matches. The next closest (Jayasuriya) played only 18 ODIs fewer than Tendulkar but 84 fewer Test matches. And his closest rival in terms of hundreds (Ponting) made 19 fewer (30 vs. Tendulkar's 49). Amongst all 35 players who have scored 10 or more hundreds in ODIs, only two (Hashim Amla and Virat Kohli) take fewer innings to score a hundred (6 and 7.1 respectively vs. 9.2 for Tendulkar). And both of them are yet to play even a hundred games each so odds on that they will be behind Tendulkar soon.

But its not just the numbers that make it memorable. At the end of the day what will stay in mind for me is all of those magical innings that he played over 20+ years. The collaring of Abdul Qadir in '89, the rise to opener in '94, the World Cup in '96, Sharjah in '98, the 186* vs NZ in '99, the World Cup (again) in '03, the CB series finals in '08, the 175 vs Aus in '09, the double hundred against SA in '10, the list is endless. And the one magical non-innings moment will be his teammates chairing him after his biggest dream (India winning the world cup) finally came true at his fifth attempt. He was the last survivor amongst my five favourite "cricketers-I've-watched-the-most" (Waugh, Ambrose, Warne, and Akram being the others). The day is not far when he'll play his last Test match and when that day comes, my love of the game will probably not diminish but some corner of my cricketing mind will find that a certain door has shut forever.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...
Post a Comment
Read more