Skip to main content

India vs. Australia: series preview

The last time India played Australia at home was also the last time they won a series against opposition that ranked in the top 5. The series winning match in Bangalore was marked by several key performances with Tendulkar scoring 214 and 53*, Vijay scored his maiden century, Pujara announced his arrival with his knock of 72 in the second innings chase, and Zaheer and Harbhajan led the charge for wickets amongst the bowlers. Given what's happened since then, you couldn't blame Dhoni if he wished desperately for a repeat of at least a few of those in the 2012-13 series launcher in Madras. Tendulkar has since not scored a Test match hundred at home (and averages 28.83), Vijay has only now reclaimed a place in the side, and Zaheer and Harbhajan are a shadow of the bowlers they were and are struggling to even keep their places in the side. Pujara is the only one who has actually enhanced his reputation and is starting to show signs that he can become the fulcrum of the batting order in future. The other fulcrum of the batting will have to be Virat Kohli and this is probably going to be the series that determines whether he has it in him to hold the line-up together and potentially be the next in line for the captaincy. As for the little giant from Mumbai, while it would be good to see him bow out with glory, the chances of that happening look slim. As much as the batting has been hot and cold (as has Dhoni's personal test match form), the shambles that is the bowling attack will be an even bigger worry for Dhoni going into the four match series. Ashwin needs a quick turnaround if he is not to go the Ajantha Mendis way of mystery bowlers rather than the Saeed Ajmal way. Ishant Sharma has now played nearly 50 games but it now looks like Warne made the "he has played the same Test 33 times" comment about the wrong bowler. That leaves Ojha and he's never going to be the bowler who singlehandedly runs through sides. Patience and perseverance are going to be the key for Dhoni's men and if they are to win it will have to be session by session, brick by brick.

One other thing that will give them some confidence is looking at the opposition. From that game in Bangalore, they have just two survivors (Clarke and Watson) whereas India have seven. No Ponting, no Hussey, and no Katich means they are light on experience and Mitchell Johnson is in a similar phase to Harbhajan (ie he's still in the squad but will struggle to make the playing XI). In Siddle, Starc, and Pattinson they have a strong pace attack and their effectiveness will be the real key to how they fare. Get it right and they will restrict a shaky Indian batting lineup to manageable totals. Get it wrong and their inexperienced batting will face up to the Indian tweakers boosted by runs to play with which will be an uphill battle. Especially given that Warner, Cowan, Hughes, and Wade will all be playing in India for the first time. They have been making the right noises and have made the right selection (in my opinion at least) in picking Henriques over Maxwell, the proof will really be in their response to pressure.

Whichever way it swings, it should be a fascinating series between two teams that are in the throes of rebuilding. And while all of the nonsense around the absence of DRS, radio and media rights issues etc does leave a bit of a bad taste, I'm really looking forward to it and am certainly not going to be as cynical as Sid Vee seems to be about it :-)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...