Skip to main content

India vs. Australia: series preview

The last time India played Australia at home was also the last time they won a series against opposition that ranked in the top 5. The series winning match in Bangalore was marked by several key performances with Tendulkar scoring 214 and 53*, Vijay scored his maiden century, Pujara announced his arrival with his knock of 72 in the second innings chase, and Zaheer and Harbhajan led the charge for wickets amongst the bowlers. Given what's happened since then, you couldn't blame Dhoni if he wished desperately for a repeat of at least a few of those in the 2012-13 series launcher in Madras. Tendulkar has since not scored a Test match hundred at home (and averages 28.83), Vijay has only now reclaimed a place in the side, and Zaheer and Harbhajan are a shadow of the bowlers they were and are struggling to even keep their places in the side. Pujara is the only one who has actually enhanced his reputation and is starting to show signs that he can become the fulcrum of the batting order in future. The other fulcrum of the batting will have to be Virat Kohli and this is probably going to be the series that determines whether he has it in him to hold the line-up together and potentially be the next in line for the captaincy. As for the little giant from Mumbai, while it would be good to see him bow out with glory, the chances of that happening look slim. As much as the batting has been hot and cold (as has Dhoni's personal test match form), the shambles that is the bowling attack will be an even bigger worry for Dhoni going into the four match series. Ashwin needs a quick turnaround if he is not to go the Ajantha Mendis way of mystery bowlers rather than the Saeed Ajmal way. Ishant Sharma has now played nearly 50 games but it now looks like Warne made the "he has played the same Test 33 times" comment about the wrong bowler. That leaves Ojha and he's never going to be the bowler who singlehandedly runs through sides. Patience and perseverance are going to be the key for Dhoni's men and if they are to win it will have to be session by session, brick by brick.

One other thing that will give them some confidence is looking at the opposition. From that game in Bangalore, they have just two survivors (Clarke and Watson) whereas India have seven. No Ponting, no Hussey, and no Katich means they are light on experience and Mitchell Johnson is in a similar phase to Harbhajan (ie he's still in the squad but will struggle to make the playing XI). In Siddle, Starc, and Pattinson they have a strong pace attack and their effectiveness will be the real key to how they fare. Get it right and they will restrict a shaky Indian batting lineup to manageable totals. Get it wrong and their inexperienced batting will face up to the Indian tweakers boosted by runs to play with which will be an uphill battle. Especially given that Warner, Cowan, Hughes, and Wade will all be playing in India for the first time. They have been making the right noises and have made the right selection (in my opinion at least) in picking Henriques over Maxwell, the proof will really be in their response to pressure.

Whichever way it swings, it should be a fascinating series between two teams that are in the throes of rebuilding. And while all of the nonsense around the absence of DRS, radio and media rights issues etc does leave a bit of a bad taste, I'm really looking forward to it and am certainly not going to be as cynical as Sid Vee seems to be about it :-)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more