Skip to main content

Half way there

How quickly things change. About this time four weeks ago, Dhoni was the captain leading a slightly unsettled team and under the scanner especially post the "we-wanted-to-sack-him" declaration from Amarnath.  Fast forward a month and Australia have been clobbered in the first two Tests, their batsmen (aside from the captain) can't seem to buy a run and to top it all off we have the Gang of Four saga as Sharda Ugra put it. The only thing seemingly in common between the two teams at the moment is that they have both just dropped their vice-captains/second most experienced player (though India does not officially appoint vice-captains for home series but more on that and Sehwag later).

I don't know if Michael Clarke is a Bon Jovi fan or not but given the ominous task facing him and his team, a rallying call along the lines of the chorus from Living on a Prayer would not be out of place. Over the last two days there's been pages and pages upon commentary and reactions about the decisions that have been made on this tour but thankfully with play starting again tomorrow, attention will be back where it belongs. And while Australia are shaken up, I personally don't subscribe to what seems to be the common view that they're heading for 4-0. First off, you only need to look as far back as England's tour of India to see that even a damaging team rift can be repaired quickly and results turned around and Pietersen is arguably a much more important player than Watson will ever be. Moreover, I'd be surprised if Warner, Cowan, and Hughes have learnt nothing from the first two matches and my bet would be that at least one of them scores big in Mohali. The same goes for Siddle and Lyon and they'll be keen to prove that they can shoulder the load as lead bowlers. The addition of Haddin will also add valuable experience and potentially the leadership that Clarke is looking for and the captain himself continues to be in glorious form. Be interesting to see the rest of the selections and whether they go for Wade over Smith and stick with Doherty. The one selection (even at the beginning of the tour) that surprised me was Smith and the fact that Inverarity and the group did not go with George Bailey or Shaun Marsh instead. Australia are not flush with batsmen at the moment and not using what little talent/temperament they possess is (in hindsight) probably not very wise.

Clarke will also draw some comfort from the fact that he faces a team that's never been the best front-runner. The last time India won three tests in a series was as far back as the '94/95 season over a rather weak Sri Lankan side. And while history is no real guide, it will be interesting to see how Dhoni and his men react to being "4-0" favourites and whether they can carry the momentum from the southern parts of the country to the north. Dropping Sehwag was a positive signal that they're not willing to sit back anymore though I would not go so far as to say that the selectors are getting all the calls right. Going with Vijay and Jadeja has proved to be a good idea (at home at least) but playing Harbhajan ahead of Ojha and persisting with Ishant does not demonstrate the most forward-looking thought. I would also have drafted in Rahane ahead of Dhawan but that's a 50/50 call so good luck to the latter as he begins his career in what is turning out to be a very new look Indian line-up. A look at the likely playing XIs for this Test compared to the ones from Australia's 4-0 clincher in Adelaide last year shows that the "inexperienced" visitors are likely to have six of the players from that match take the field in Mohali. India on the other hand will have only four and yet will start favourites. How quickly things change.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...