Skip to main content

Half way there

How quickly things change. About this time four weeks ago, Dhoni was the captain leading a slightly unsettled team and under the scanner especially post the "we-wanted-to-sack-him" declaration from Amarnath.  Fast forward a month and Australia have been clobbered in the first two Tests, their batsmen (aside from the captain) can't seem to buy a run and to top it all off we have the Gang of Four saga as Sharda Ugra put it. The only thing seemingly in common between the two teams at the moment is that they have both just dropped their vice-captains/second most experienced player (though India does not officially appoint vice-captains for home series but more on that and Sehwag later).

I don't know if Michael Clarke is a Bon Jovi fan or not but given the ominous task facing him and his team, a rallying call along the lines of the chorus from Living on a Prayer would not be out of place. Over the last two days there's been pages and pages upon commentary and reactions about the decisions that have been made on this tour but thankfully with play starting again tomorrow, attention will be back where it belongs. And while Australia are shaken up, I personally don't subscribe to what seems to be the common view that they're heading for 4-0. First off, you only need to look as far back as England's tour of India to see that even a damaging team rift can be repaired quickly and results turned around and Pietersen is arguably a much more important player than Watson will ever be. Moreover, I'd be surprised if Warner, Cowan, and Hughes have learnt nothing from the first two matches and my bet would be that at least one of them scores big in Mohali. The same goes for Siddle and Lyon and they'll be keen to prove that they can shoulder the load as lead bowlers. The addition of Haddin will also add valuable experience and potentially the leadership that Clarke is looking for and the captain himself continues to be in glorious form. Be interesting to see the rest of the selections and whether they go for Wade over Smith and stick with Doherty. The one selection (even at the beginning of the tour) that surprised me was Smith and the fact that Inverarity and the group did not go with George Bailey or Shaun Marsh instead. Australia are not flush with batsmen at the moment and not using what little talent/temperament they possess is (in hindsight) probably not very wise.

Clarke will also draw some comfort from the fact that he faces a team that's never been the best front-runner. The last time India won three tests in a series was as far back as the '94/95 season over a rather weak Sri Lankan side. And while history is no real guide, it will be interesting to see how Dhoni and his men react to being "4-0" favourites and whether they can carry the momentum from the southern parts of the country to the north. Dropping Sehwag was a positive signal that they're not willing to sit back anymore though I would not go so far as to say that the selectors are getting all the calls right. Going with Vijay and Jadeja has proved to be a good idea (at home at least) but playing Harbhajan ahead of Ojha and persisting with Ishant does not demonstrate the most forward-looking thought. I would also have drafted in Rahane ahead of Dhawan but that's a 50/50 call so good luck to the latter as he begins his career in what is turning out to be a very new look Indian line-up. A look at the likely playing XIs for this Test compared to the ones from Australia's 4-0 clincher in Adelaide last year shows that the "inexperienced" visitors are likely to have six of the players from that match take the field in Mohali. India on the other hand will have only four and yet will start favourites. How quickly things change.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...