Skip to main content

Half way there

How quickly things change. About this time four weeks ago, Dhoni was the captain leading a slightly unsettled team and under the scanner especially post the "we-wanted-to-sack-him" declaration from Amarnath.  Fast forward a month and Australia have been clobbered in the first two Tests, their batsmen (aside from the captain) can't seem to buy a run and to top it all off we have the Gang of Four saga as Sharda Ugra put it. The only thing seemingly in common between the two teams at the moment is that they have both just dropped their vice-captains/second most experienced player (though India does not officially appoint vice-captains for home series but more on that and Sehwag later).

I don't know if Michael Clarke is a Bon Jovi fan or not but given the ominous task facing him and his team, a rallying call along the lines of the chorus from Living on a Prayer would not be out of place. Over the last two days there's been pages and pages upon commentary and reactions about the decisions that have been made on this tour but thankfully with play starting again tomorrow, attention will be back where it belongs. And while Australia are shaken up, I personally don't subscribe to what seems to be the common view that they're heading for 4-0. First off, you only need to look as far back as England's tour of India to see that even a damaging team rift can be repaired quickly and results turned around and Pietersen is arguably a much more important player than Watson will ever be. Moreover, I'd be surprised if Warner, Cowan, and Hughes have learnt nothing from the first two matches and my bet would be that at least one of them scores big in Mohali. The same goes for Siddle and Lyon and they'll be keen to prove that they can shoulder the load as lead bowlers. The addition of Haddin will also add valuable experience and potentially the leadership that Clarke is looking for and the captain himself continues to be in glorious form. Be interesting to see the rest of the selections and whether they go for Wade over Smith and stick with Doherty. The one selection (even at the beginning of the tour) that surprised me was Smith and the fact that Inverarity and the group did not go with George Bailey or Shaun Marsh instead. Australia are not flush with batsmen at the moment and not using what little talent/temperament they possess is (in hindsight) probably not very wise.

Clarke will also draw some comfort from the fact that he faces a team that's never been the best front-runner. The last time India won three tests in a series was as far back as the '94/95 season over a rather weak Sri Lankan side. And while history is no real guide, it will be interesting to see how Dhoni and his men react to being "4-0" favourites and whether they can carry the momentum from the southern parts of the country to the north. Dropping Sehwag was a positive signal that they're not willing to sit back anymore though I would not go so far as to say that the selectors are getting all the calls right. Going with Vijay and Jadeja has proved to be a good idea (at home at least) but playing Harbhajan ahead of Ojha and persisting with Ishant does not demonstrate the most forward-looking thought. I would also have drafted in Rahane ahead of Dhawan but that's a 50/50 call so good luck to the latter as he begins his career in what is turning out to be a very new look Indian line-up. A look at the likely playing XIs for this Test compared to the ones from Australia's 4-0 clincher in Adelaide last year shows that the "inexperienced" visitors are likely to have six of the players from that match take the field in Mohali. India on the other hand will have only four and yet will start favourites. How quickly things change.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...