Skip to main content

A good break (amid other stuff like the IPL)

Not only was my recent holiday in Japan a good break from work and everything it also came right around the time there's a break in the international cricketing calendar. And while I really enjoy following the game and am relishing the recent mini-revival in Test cricket, it is good to get some time to take stock and do the other things like stats analysis that I enjoy.

The IPL (beyond the curiosity value of the first two seasons) is something I've never really cottoned onto and the county game (which I used to follow as a teenager) has become increasingly poor quality and dominated by international have-beens who are past 35. I suppose that I'm not a cricket obsessive after all :-)


One piece on the IPL that I did find to be interested reading though was David Hopps' piece on ESPNcricinfo. The whole piece is worth reading but this bit particularly caught my attention - "It has a wonderfully rich history - many historians would claim that the Championship is in its 150th year, a fact that predictably has passed entirely unnoticed. We resent anything that threatens to undermine it." Cut out the specific bit about the Championship and it almost reads like a one-line summary of the problem with modern day England. The fact that they are too caught up in their history and resolutely refuse to look forward. Now I personally appreciate history a fair bit (and in an alternate universe might have ended up being a history professor) but the English completely confound me with their obsession about their history and tradition. And the solution probably lies in another line from the same piece - "We feel, as we always have, that we can educate the world, but too many of us laze around feeling the world owes us a living." That's to explore for another day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...