Skip to main content

A good break (amid other stuff like the IPL)

Not only was my recent holiday in Japan a good break from work and everything it also came right around the time there's a break in the international cricketing calendar. And while I really enjoy following the game and am relishing the recent mini-revival in Test cricket, it is good to get some time to take stock and do the other things like stats analysis that I enjoy.

The IPL (beyond the curiosity value of the first two seasons) is something I've never really cottoned onto and the county game (which I used to follow as a teenager) has become increasingly poor quality and dominated by international have-beens who are past 35. I suppose that I'm not a cricket obsessive after all :-)


One piece on the IPL that I did find to be interested reading though was David Hopps' piece on ESPNcricinfo. The whole piece is worth reading but this bit particularly caught my attention - "It has a wonderfully rich history - many historians would claim that the Championship is in its 150th year, a fact that predictably has passed entirely unnoticed. We resent anything that threatens to undermine it." Cut out the specific bit about the Championship and it almost reads like a one-line summary of the problem with modern day England. The fact that they are too caught up in their history and resolutely refuse to look forward. Now I personally appreciate history a fair bit (and in an alternate universe might have ended up being a history professor) but the English completely confound me with their obsession about their history and tradition. And the solution probably lies in another line from the same piece - "We feel, as we always have, that we can educate the world, but too many of us laze around feeling the world owes us a living." That's to explore for another day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...