Skip to main content

Left fast magic

I have always liked the word southpaw. You know how there are some words that one takes an affinity to for inexplicable reasons? Southpaw is one of those for me. In a cricketing context I always found it ironic that the term was used much more for left-handed batsmen than left arm bowlers, especially given the origin of the word.

Left arm pace bowlers are a breed I've always loved watching primarily because Wasim Akram was one of my favourite cricketers in my early days of following the game. There was something completely magical and joyful in the way he bowled and I can still recall some of his incredible spells from the early '90s. The memorable '92 WC final of course with those two magic balls, but even more so the first morning of the Oval Test in 1992 a few months later and the sensational spells he and Waqar Younis conjured up to blow away the Kiwis early the next year. Other left arm quicks since haven't quite matched up, but nevertheless Bruce Reid, Chaminda Vaas, Zaheer Khan, Mitchell Johnson, and Irfan Pathan have all been very good in their own right and on their days great to watch. In fact, I've been fortunate that of the eleven left arm seamers to take more than 100 Test wickets, seven have played most (if not all) their cricket during my viewing years.

It was nice then to see a couple of pieces on ESPNcricinfo recently with odes to some left arm bowlers suggesting that I was not alone in my appreciation for the breed. First, this excellently written piece by Jon Hotten which focuses on the mercurial Johnson and how he will be missed during the Ashes. And while I don't fully agree (with a misfiring batting line-up, Clarke and the Aussies don't really need a bowler who can implode as spectacularly as Mitch is capable of), he is fascinating to watch at all times. And while he'll continue to be an important component of the ODI and T20 teams, his Test match career looks to be practically over given the plethora of young, talented quicks the Aussies have lined up. India on the other hand have never had such riches and so its a shame that someone like Ashish Nehra never went on to become the capable Test match bowler he should have been due to a combination of injuries and mismanagement. He did provide us many moments to cherish though as this piece points out, particularly in World Cups. My favourite Nehra moment though comes from the Port of Spain Test in 2002, when he knocked over Lara and Hooper in quick succession during a tight fourth innings chase. India went on to their first Test win in the Caribbean since 1976 and in Nehra and Zaheer Khan it looked like a solid succession line to Srinath had been built. Sadly only one of the two went on to bigger things.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...