Skip to main content

Left fast magic

I have always liked the word southpaw. You know how there are some words that one takes an affinity to for inexplicable reasons? Southpaw is one of those for me. In a cricketing context I always found it ironic that the term was used much more for left-handed batsmen than left arm bowlers, especially given the origin of the word.

Left arm pace bowlers are a breed I've always loved watching primarily because Wasim Akram was one of my favourite cricketers in my early days of following the game. There was something completely magical and joyful in the way he bowled and I can still recall some of his incredible spells from the early '90s. The memorable '92 WC final of course with those two magic balls, but even more so the first morning of the Oval Test in 1992 a few months later and the sensational spells he and Waqar Younis conjured up to blow away the Kiwis early the next year. Other left arm quicks since haven't quite matched up, but nevertheless Bruce Reid, Chaminda Vaas, Zaheer Khan, Mitchell Johnson, and Irfan Pathan have all been very good in their own right and on their days great to watch. In fact, I've been fortunate that of the eleven left arm seamers to take more than 100 Test wickets, seven have played most (if not all) their cricket during my viewing years.

It was nice then to see a couple of pieces on ESPNcricinfo recently with odes to some left arm bowlers suggesting that I was not alone in my appreciation for the breed. First, this excellently written piece by Jon Hotten which focuses on the mercurial Johnson and how he will be missed during the Ashes. And while I don't fully agree (with a misfiring batting line-up, Clarke and the Aussies don't really need a bowler who can implode as spectacularly as Mitch is capable of), he is fascinating to watch at all times. And while he'll continue to be an important component of the ODI and T20 teams, his Test match career looks to be practically over given the plethora of young, talented quicks the Aussies have lined up. India on the other hand have never had such riches and so its a shame that someone like Ashish Nehra never went on to become the capable Test match bowler he should have been due to a combination of injuries and mismanagement. He did provide us many moments to cherish though as this piece points out, particularly in World Cups. My favourite Nehra moment though comes from the Port of Spain Test in 2002, when he knocked over Lara and Hooper in quick succession during a tight fourth innings chase. India went on to their first Test win in the Caribbean since 1976 and in Nehra and Zaheer Khan it looked like a solid succession line to Srinath had been built. Sadly only one of the two went on to bigger things.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?