Skip to main content

Sundry thoughts on the IPL

First up, a disclaimer. I don't dislike the IPL. I have not really become a fan but neither do I completely ignore it. In theory, the idea of a cricketing league similar in structure (and maybe one day in popularity) to football leagues the world over is great. As a passionate follower of the game, I would be delighted if that came to fruition in the future but again as a passionate follower of the game, I find the IPL lacking in something. Maybe its the fact that the format is too heavily loaded in favour of the batsmen. Or that there are too many games and it becomes impossible to distinguish one game from another (heaven knows how Americans follow the MLB with 162 games per team!!). Or (and I'm being snobbish here) the fact that Dwayne Smith plays ahead of Ricky Ponting because he is a better slogger. But mostly I think its the fact that the quality is not consistently good enough. It would be simplistic I think to attribute that to the format alone. Yes, T20 games can be skittish but if that were the only reason why is it that the World T20 tournaments have produced many more memorable contests in far fewer games (or maybe that's one reason)?

Sample this stat from this year's edition. Of the nine teams playing, seven had nine or more players who played in five games or fewer (Chennai Super Kings and Sunrisers Hyderabad were the only exceptions with just five each). That's nearly a third of the squad who got to play in less than a third of the games. Not to mention the many players who didn't get a game at all. This clearly suggest that most teams struggled to find 11 players that were good enough to persist with for a bulk of the duration of the tournament. And its these weak links (if that's not being too harsh on the players in question) that reduce the overall quality. Much like India's premier four-day domestic tournament which suffers from too many teams and not enough players of the right standard, the IPL too demonstrates that the pool of local players of the right quality is not deep enough to sustain nine teams over two months. Maybe that will improve over time. But maybe it won't and there will only be more teams that dilute the contests further.

And then there's the whole conflicts and corruption issues. Personally, the former bothers me much more than the latter. Given the betting set-up in a country like India (as Ed Hawkins points out in this great piece), and the fact that athletes have a short time to earn their living, if you're a has-been (like Sreesanth) or not particularly talented (like Chandila), its easy to see how the temptation sets in. Fixing and corruption is a problem common to all team sports leagues around the world and will be as long as human beings are the ones participating. Conflict of interests on the other hand (like Srinivasan's multiple roles) should be easier to weed out structurally and to me its a lack of intent rather than inherent weaknesses that cause them. Or maybe the lack of intent is just another form of weakness or corruption. Siddhartha Vaidyanathan has a great article on his (excellent though not prolific enough) blog that covers these in much more detail and much more eloquently.

Its not all bad though. The IPL is a great platform for young players to demonstrate what they might be capable of and why they deserve more opportunities (as Harsha Bhogle describes in his usual from the heart manner here). Not only that, it also breaks down the barriers across international players and allows players like Chris Morris to learn from MS Dhoni and Mike Hussey. The fact that it has expanded the audience for the game (even if many of those new followers don't actually follow the other forms of the game), and led to the creation of some great new stadiums are also more than fringe benefits. And best of all, it has shifted market power from boards to the hands of the players which is the right balance.

Now if only I could get myself to actually watch a few games....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

An Asian Test summer

Little that's happened in the cricketing world recently has given me as much pleasure as Pakistan's ascent to the #1 ranking in Tests . Though it finally happened in slightly farcical circumstances with the outfield fiasco in Port-of-Spain, it couldn't have come at a better time for the country, and more importantly Misbah-ul-Haq deserved it for the sterling job he's done in the last five years. Sportspersons are constantly challenged in having to live out of hotel rooms and away from friends and family for long periods of time. And for this Pakistan team, the burden has been manifold given the inability to play even their own domestic T20 league at home, let alone international cricket. Not for a month, or a year but for nearly seven years now. That needs a huge degree of mental toughness especially for the younger players, not to say adjusting to non-home conditions. Coupled with that toughness, the other quality that this team has displayed unlike some of their pr...

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...