Skip to main content

Champions Trophy 2013: the ODI burial begins

One day cricket is in trouble. The advent of T20 and the popularity of the leagues that have spawned everywhere was supposed to endanger Test cricket but its had as much of an effect (if not a greater one) on its closer limited overs cousin. 2012 marked the first time since 1995 (when there were still 6 match Test series and 55 overs a side ODIs played in England) that there were fewer than 100 ODIs played in a full calendar year. And with the ICC deciding to do away with the Champions Trophy after this year's edition, the format is going to lose what was arguably its best and snappiest tournament. The frequent tinkering with the rules isn't helping the format much either and it'll be interesting to see what happens if the 2015 World Cup is not a popular event (especially given large parts of it will be held in Australia who might be recovering from a double Ashes loss).

That sub-text around the format is one of two things that drive my interest in the tournament that kicks off tomorrow. The other is the fact that there is no clear favourite by any means for the event and each team has its own set of demons to wrestle with and its own sub-text. So I'm going to quickly jot down my brief notes on each team (in alphabetical order) and predictions as to how they will fare. Given my past track record, I expect to be mostly wrong but since this is for fun and I'm no Meiyappan, I can afford to stick my neck out :-)

Australia: Clarke's back and their bowling will determine how far they go
MVP: Shane Watson but expect teams to sledge him a fair bit given recent events
Prediction: They'll make it to the semis but no further and lose the last "title" they hold

England: Home conditions should help but they are rather inflexible as a team and sorely miss Pietersen
MVP: James Anderson but lack of bowling support might mean too much of a burden on him
Prediction: Won't make the semis and will ring the changes before 2015

India: Most inexperienced team they have fielded in years and the IPL fixing episode is a distraction
MVP: MS Dhoni already has a big burden to shoulder but the low expectations might help
Prediction: Will fight gamely but in the tougher group of the two so will exit before semis

New Zealand: Ranked the lowest amongst the teams here but solid big tournament temperament
MVP: Hard to pick one given they're all about team effort but Martin Guptill maybe given recent form?
Prediction: Losing semi-finalist alongside their trans-Tasmanian rivals

Pakistan: Probably the most balanced bowling line-up though their batting can be suspect
MVP: Mohammad Hafeez is tipped to be their next skipper and this is his chance to show why
Prediction: They will pick up the one ICC title that has eluded them so far

South Africa: Similar to India in that they are inexperienced and therefore not as much expected
MVP: Again similar to India, their wicket-keeper captain and best bat but will deVilliers back hold?
Prediction: No dream farewell for Kirsten as they'll get knocked out early

Sri Lanka: Team in rebuild phase though many of the experienced (but declining) hands are still there
MVP: Dinesh Chandimal now leads the T20 team and is their new batting hope
Prediction: Will struggle against teams with superior seam bowling and bow out before the last four

West Indies: Current T20 champions and possibly have the most match-turning players in limited overs
MVP: Time for Darren Bravo to get out of the shadow of his half brother (and now skipper)
Prediction: Will make the finals for the second time in a Champions Trophy tourney in England

So my semi-final line-up will be West Indies vs New Zealand and Pakistan vs Australia with Pakistan to defeat the West Indies in the final. Gentlemen, play!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more