Skip to main content

Five wishes for the Ashes

The biggest attraction of the Ashes for me is the fact that it is a five match series. Its only over that duration that the true grit and ability of sides emerges and it is a pity that the biggest casualty of the overloaded international cricket calendar has been the five match Test series. The Ashes is about the only remaining one and the number of non-Ashes series played over five matches in the recent past is less than the number of fingers on one hand. And to find a five match series that does not involve England, one has to go back more than ten years!

So while having two Ashes series in successive seasons is probably a bit much, I for one will not be complaining at all even if as George Dobell points out, these two teams are nowhere near the best in the world at the moment. I will not be making any predictions either though I will be really surprised if England don't win, though it probably won't be as much of a walkover as many in the media would make it seem. Instead, I'm going to go with five things that I will be wishing for that will hopefully make for good viewing, especially as a neutral.

1) Matt Prior at #6: The biggest "area of development" (to use a very corporate term) for Alistair Cook as a captain in my opinion is to be more positive especially given the personnel he has at hand. England's biggest trump cards in the series are Anderson and Swann and playing with only four bowlers over a five match series opens them up to more injury risk, especially Swann. So I'd like to see an England line-up with Prior at #6 (he's more than capable) allowing them to play five bowlers. Bresnan, Broad, and Swann will need to step up on their batting but there's no reason to not have faith that they can.

2) Harris/Bird ahead of Mitchell Starc: Indications seem to be that Mitchell Starc will be in Clarke's first choice bowling line-up but I for one would love to see Ryan Harris or Jackson Bird play ahead of him. With Pattinson and Siddle as their strike bowlers, what Clarke will really need from his third seamer is control. And in flat and hot conditions, Starc was unable to deliver that at all in India. While not as flat and nowhere near as hot, the dry summer will present similar surfaces and a repeat of Chennai/Mohali is not what the Aussies will want. Starc's time will come, maybe as early as the return series.

3) Root and Smith scoring hundreds: One of the big gaps between the new generation of cricketers (post T20 if you will) and the previous ones is the lack of young batsmen making a mark in Test cricket. A look at the table of top Test averages (with a cutoff of 1000 runs scored) since 2010 shows that there isn't a single player under 25 in the top 20 (Darren Bravo and Tamim Iqbal are at 21 and 22). So the emergence of Joe Root in particular is cause for celebration and to see him make an Ashes hundred would be great. I'm a big fan of Steve Smith as well and in a struggling Aussie line-up he can bring in a lot of vim and vigour at 5/6 if given a chance.

4) Long spells for Nathan Lyon: Spin will play more than a supporting role in this series and while Michael Clarke's overall handling of Nathan Lyon has been pretty solid, the inconsistent treatment meted out to Lyon in India was hard to fathom. And while Lyon's overall record is not spectacular by any means, he's the best Australia have and is still only 25 so needs strong backing. Some good fields for him and the confidence of long spells will be critical if Australia are to have even a sniff.

5) Swann and Panesar in tandem: Staying with the spin theme, my last wish will be to see Australia having to face up to Swann and Panesar at the same time, at least at Old Trafford and the Oval. If the teams most recent tours of India are any indication, the last thing Australia will want to see is a turning wicket and an off-spinner and a left-armer attacking their shaky-against-spin line-up. Of course, for this wish to come true, the first one will also have to but hey given its just wishes, no reason not to make them interdependent :-)

So those are the five things that'll have me delighted though a five match series is enough as it is. Hoping its as least as good as the last one we had in England if not 2005. Maybe then the ICC will insist on more five match series amongst other teams. Now there's a wish that will never come true!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...