The announcement (finally) of the Test Championship gladdened my heart as I'm sure it did for all other cricket lovers who still favour the format over the limited overs ones. And while the minimum requirement of 16 Tests in each four year cycle feels really low, at least its good news for the likes of Sri Lanka, West Indies, Bangladesh, and Zimbabwe who struggle to get enough Tests scheduled otherwise. The increased gap between world T20 tournaments will also ensure the right level of desire in the teams for that title.
What is not so good news is the selection of the venues for the different world tourneys. The list puts down on paper for the first time a fact that cricket fans world over have known for some time, which is that all the power and control at the ICC sits in the hands of the Indian, English, and Australian cricket boards. Bangladesh are the hosts of the next World T20, and New Zealand get a share of the next ODI World Cup in 2015 but after that the hegemony sets in. Total representation (as hosts) for South Africa, Pakistan, New Zealand, West Indies, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Zimbabwe till 2023? Zero. Zilch. Is this the first sign of an eventual two-tier system between the major cricket playing countries?
What is not so good news is the selection of the venues for the different world tourneys. The list puts down on paper for the first time a fact that cricket fans world over have known for some time, which is that all the power and control at the ICC sits in the hands of the Indian, English, and Australian cricket boards. Bangladesh are the hosts of the next World T20, and New Zealand get a share of the next ODI World Cup in 2015 but after that the hegemony sets in. Total representation (as hosts) for South Africa, Pakistan, New Zealand, West Indies, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Zimbabwe till 2023? Zero. Zilch. Is this the first sign of an eventual two-tier system between the major cricket playing countries?
Comments