Skip to main content

The forgotten five

There's been much (and deserved) kudos for MS Dhoni and his band of (mostly young and merry) men in the wake of India's recent run of good results starting with the Test series against Australia at home. Forgotten amidst the hoopla though has been the instrumental role that Sandeep Patil, Vikram Rathour, Roger Binny, Saba Karim, and Rajinder Hans have played in enabling this. Much like the best wicketkeepers, selectors usually get noticed only when teams do badly and they are usually deemed a bunch of idiots for selecting players who are either out of form or not good enough. Rarely does the pendulum swing enough the other way when the same teams perform above expectations and win accolades.

Sample the many key decisions that Patil and Co. have made since coming together at a time when India were at a real low following the much talked about 0-8 and an early exit from the World T20 soon after the new selection committee came on board. First, the dropping of Zaheer, Harbhajan, and Yuvraj for the last Test against England in 2012 showing that they were not afraid to be unpopular. No immediate success came forth as India still lost to Cook's men but the gumption that the selectors had shown was reaffirmed by the decisions to leave out first Gambhir and then Sehwag from the team against Australia, the latter despite the fact that the team was up 2-0. They then stuck to their guns for the Champions Trophy squad (which I wrote about here) with great results. And the latest addition to their portfolio of good moves is the selection of the squads for the ODI series in Zimbabwe and the 'A' team to tour South Africa.

The former which leaves the team shorn of its skipper (and best batsman) as well as the first choice bowling attack is a big risk, especially given what happened the last time India travelled to Zimbabwe with a similar squad of understudies. But given the questions that might be answered (or at least begin to be answered), it feels totally worth it. Is Kohli captaincy material? Will Dhawan and Rohit Sharma continue their development as an opening pair? Will Pujara cut it in ODIs? Can Amit Mishra recapture his early promise? Are Mohit Sharma and Pervez Rasool capable of playing international cricket? If even one or two of these are partially answered, Indian cricket will have benefited immensely in the long run.

The 'A' team visit to South Africa is potentially even more critical in a year in which the biggest test (no pun intended) comes at the fag end of the calendar year when Dhoni and gang take on the world no.1 side in their backyard. Cynics will say that the only reason India will avoid another 0-4 result is because there are only three Test matches to play. For the more positive fans and most of the team (and if Tendulkar doesn't make it then all the team) though it will be a great opportunity to show that the promise from the 4-0 defeat of Australia was not just driven by the benefit of home conditions against sub-standard opposition. And that's what makes the 'A' tour so critically important given that it will be the only chance for the likes of Dhawan, Vijay, and Rohit Sharma to get experience of the conditions in South Africa (apart from any tour games before the Tests). A minor quibble is the fact that none of Bhuvneshwar, Ishant, or Umesh Yadav are in the squad but given that the bowling has historically not been India's problem in South Africa, testing the seam bowling bench strength may not be a bad idea.

Just the fact that we are talking of bench strength and thoughts around building it, is a great turnaround for a team that was in the doldrums even 8 months ago. Given the flak he took during the low period, Dhoni deserves all the credit he is getting now but he for one will have sent his thank you note to Patil and Co. Its about time the fans and the media did too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...