Skip to main content

The forgotten five

There's been much (and deserved) kudos for MS Dhoni and his band of (mostly young and merry) men in the wake of India's recent run of good results starting with the Test series against Australia at home. Forgotten amidst the hoopla though has been the instrumental role that Sandeep Patil, Vikram Rathour, Roger Binny, Saba Karim, and Rajinder Hans have played in enabling this. Much like the best wicketkeepers, selectors usually get noticed only when teams do badly and they are usually deemed a bunch of idiots for selecting players who are either out of form or not good enough. Rarely does the pendulum swing enough the other way when the same teams perform above expectations and win accolades.

Sample the many key decisions that Patil and Co. have made since coming together at a time when India were at a real low following the much talked about 0-8 and an early exit from the World T20 soon after the new selection committee came on board. First, the dropping of Zaheer, Harbhajan, and Yuvraj for the last Test against England in 2012 showing that they were not afraid to be unpopular. No immediate success came forth as India still lost to Cook's men but the gumption that the selectors had shown was reaffirmed by the decisions to leave out first Gambhir and then Sehwag from the team against Australia, the latter despite the fact that the team was up 2-0. They then stuck to their guns for the Champions Trophy squad (which I wrote about here) with great results. And the latest addition to their portfolio of good moves is the selection of the squads for the ODI series in Zimbabwe and the 'A' team to tour South Africa.

The former which leaves the team shorn of its skipper (and best batsman) as well as the first choice bowling attack is a big risk, especially given what happened the last time India travelled to Zimbabwe with a similar squad of understudies. But given the questions that might be answered (or at least begin to be answered), it feels totally worth it. Is Kohli captaincy material? Will Dhawan and Rohit Sharma continue their development as an opening pair? Will Pujara cut it in ODIs? Can Amit Mishra recapture his early promise? Are Mohit Sharma and Pervez Rasool capable of playing international cricket? If even one or two of these are partially answered, Indian cricket will have benefited immensely in the long run.

The 'A' team visit to South Africa is potentially even more critical in a year in which the biggest test (no pun intended) comes at the fag end of the calendar year when Dhoni and gang take on the world no.1 side in their backyard. Cynics will say that the only reason India will avoid another 0-4 result is because there are only three Test matches to play. For the more positive fans and most of the team (and if Tendulkar doesn't make it then all the team) though it will be a great opportunity to show that the promise from the 4-0 defeat of Australia was not just driven by the benefit of home conditions against sub-standard opposition. And that's what makes the 'A' tour so critically important given that it will be the only chance for the likes of Dhawan, Vijay, and Rohit Sharma to get experience of the conditions in South Africa (apart from any tour games before the Tests). A minor quibble is the fact that none of Bhuvneshwar, Ishant, or Umesh Yadav are in the squad but given that the bowling has historically not been India's problem in South Africa, testing the seam bowling bench strength may not be a bad idea.

Just the fact that we are talking of bench strength and thoughts around building it, is a great turnaround for a team that was in the doldrums even 8 months ago. Given the flak he took during the low period, Dhoni deserves all the credit he is getting now but he for one will have sent his thank you note to Patil and Co. Its about time the fans and the media did too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...