Skip to main content

The decline of cricket coverage in the Indian press

I remember the times when I used to really look forward to the cricket coverage in mainstream newspapers like the Hindu and the Indian Express  and of course my weekly copy of Sportstar. There was so much variety in the narrative styles and the topics covered, that a young boy like me who was just becoming familiar with the game learnt a huge amount from these publications.

The tremendous rise of the internet (and especially ESPNcricinfo) as means of cricket content consumption though has been accompanied by an equally precipitous decline in the standards of cricket coverage in these same publications of old. It could also be that I have learnt more about the game and hence am more critical/discerning. Or it could be that I don't bother to spend enough time looking outside Cricinfo and a few select blogs that I just don't find the other worthwhile pieces?

Whatever the reasons, the current reality is that my expectations tend to be really low from Indian newspapers and so when I do find a piece that's not the same old stuff regurgitated and is actually worth reading, it grabs my attention more than it would otherwise. Sandeep Dwivedi's recent piece on Zaheer and Yuvraj doing fitness work in France is one such. It may not be the best written but at least it focuses on a real story without hypothesising too much and also attempts to look (albeit somewhat briefly) at the humans behind the bowler/batsmen.

Indians don't suffer in comparison to other cricket playing countries when it comes to writing skills and cricket knowledge so how come none of the good writers choose to work for newspapers?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...
Post a Comment
Read more

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...
Post a Comment
Read more

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...
Post a Comment
Read more