Skip to main content

A fresh start

If I had to sum Mahendra Singh Dhoni up in one word it would be equanimous. When you listen to him after a press conference its sometimes hard to tell what the result of the game was, let alone his own individual performance. Its this equanimity too that helps him play the most incredible nerveless innings (like the one described here by Siddhartha Vaidyanathan) and handle the various off-field shenanigans that the world of Indian cricket keeps throwing up. So it wasn't a real surprise to hear him be pretty sang-froid about India's relatively inexperienced squad for the tour of South Africa. Behind the calm though is a man keenly aware (though probably not too concerned) that until he reaps overseas Test success, his detractors will not acknowledge his abilities as captain despite his record being the best by far of any Indian captain. India's next year and a bit which has them playing 13 Tests across South Africa, New Zealand, England, and Australia gives him that opportunity not to mention a chance to improve his own batting record outside the subcontinent.

Its also an opportunity for an incredibly young Indian team to start to forge a new Test match identity. The XI likely to take the field on December 18 at the Wanderers has an average age of 27.5 (and if Umesh Yadav is picked ahead of Zaheer Khan that would drop further to 26.7). In comparison, the South African first choice line-up has an average age that's four years more. Even more tellingly, the total Test experience of the probable XI for India adds up to less than the combined caps for Kallis and Smith alone. Inevitably, this will mean that there will be some batting collapses and bowling meltdowns as these tyros will learn from their overseas experiences. If however, the batsmen can all learn as quickly as Kohli did on the tour of Australia in 2011/12, India won't be too badly off. If not, Steyn, Philander and co will make mincemeat of them as they have done with most visiting teams in recent times. The bowlers too will be up against it, primarily due to a lack of experience in these conditions (especially if Zaheer is not back to somewhere near his best). Despite all that can go wrong though, it will be nice to see India being bold and playing five bowlers with Dhoni at #6. Early indications are that Fletcher and he might do so but time will tell. Promoting Jadeja up the order in the ODIs might not be a bad way to suss out such an option, though given his focus on winning games, I'd be surprised if that happens. Instead, the undeserving Raina and Yuvraj will continue to form the middle order despite the fact that they will be liabilities in Australia come the 2015 World Cup.

South Africa on the other hand are looking for a fresh start in ODIs rather than in the longer format. Even an incredibly unlikely 0-2 loss in the Test series won't dethrone them from the #1 spot and given how stable and well oiled their line-up is, anything other than a series win will be unsatisfactory in the extreme. In limited overs though, de Villiers hasn't had the best of starts to his tenure as captain with the team winning barely more than half their games overall and only that many at home as well. Unlike India who have a settled side in this format, they've chopped and changed batting combinations so much that no one knows their role anymore. And with Kallis back in the side again, things are set to change once more. Personally, I think South Africa are better off gently setting the likes of Kallis, Smith, and Philander aside from their ODI plans and betting on players like Miller, du Plessis, and Morris instead but clearly that's not what de Villiers and Domingo think at the moment.

All in all, it should be a fascinating (if slightly short) set of contests. My predictions: India to win the ODIs 2-1 and South Africa to win the Tests 1-0. Although the other way round is equally possible (if less likely).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...