Skip to main content

Captains, centuries, and comebacks

July 21st feels like a different age now but in actual fact it was less than half a year back. For Cook and Clarke it must seem like an eon and more given how their respective positions as captains has reversed. One thing that has not changed though is their batting form. Clarke had a blip in those first two games in England but came roaring back to form in the third Test of the summer and has continued the good work with two more hundreds since. Cook's scores on the other hand (since the third Test of the summer) read 62, 0, 51, 22, 25, 34, 13, 65, 3, and 1. Hardly what you'd expect from a man who averages 47.2 and scores a hundred every seven innings. Its hard enough to be out of form as captain (and the team's main batsman) when your team is winning. But when you're down 0-2 and on the brink of losing the Ashes, and your senior players are not performing, the weight of personal failure must seem crushing. Cook though has always come across as someone who could bear that weight. And if he needs inspiration, he only need look at his opposite number. Ever since he took over from Ricky Ponting, Clarke has only gotten flak (despite his own good form) driven by results that were decent to begin with but descended into the abysmal earlier this year in India and England. He's stayed strong though and things have turned around (and how).

No one exemplifies the turnaround better than Mitchell Johnson who's (deservingly) the story of the series so far. In his last 17 matches (before this series), Johnson claimed less than three scalps a match at an average just below 40 and a strike rate of every 11 overs. In two games this series, he already has 17 wickets at an average less than 13, striking every six overs or less. He's been solidly supported by his fellow attack members as they have all conceded runs at less than three an over and resemble Flower's chosen form of attack more than the Zimbabwean's own charges do. Bowling dry, the mantra that's served England so well in the last few years has escaped them and despite all the talk of batting failures, this is what has really put them on the back foot. Tim Bresnan's return to the side will be very welcome and much as I would like to see him replace Swann and not Panesar, I don't see that happening. Anderson also looks tired (and who wouldn't be after running in to bowl nearly 8000 times in the last three years). Swann and Broad are also in the top five on that list whereas Lyon and Siddle (the only Aussies in the top 10) have bowled almost 2000 deliveries less than Anderson and Swann. And its showing.

Cook and his men though will have to believe that a comeback of some sort is possible against a good but still mercurial Australian line-up. Clarke on the other hand will want the mercury to stay away for some more time, especially when it comes to his left-handed duo of Johnson and Warner. Given that England have won just once in a dozen attempts at Perth and a similar looking line-up was ripped up by Johnson the last time they were here, Clarke will be the more confident captain moving into his century of caps.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...