Skip to main content

Patience and other virtues

The only breed more inconsistent than the Indian seamers are the Indian fans. If you went by the headlines, fan comments in social media, and interactions with followers of the Indian cricket team, India constantly bounce back and forth between being the best team in the world and worse than Bangladesh/Zimbabwe. There is no middle ground. Reactions over the last three years would bear testament to this:

April 2011: India win the World Cup after a good tour of South Africa. All hail the best team in the world.
January 2012: Successive 0-4 batterings against England and Australia. India are the pits and Dhoni and all the senior players should be sacked (Dravid and Laxman retire)
June 2013: India win the Champions Trophy after wiping out Australia 4-0. Best team in the world again.
February 2014: Away losses mount again after defeats to South Africa and New Zealand. Back to being the pits (sack Dhoni etc)

Passion is a great quality but when not tempered with patience (as is the case with most Indian fans), it begins to grow weary soon. This latest round of hand-wringing after the ODI series against New Zealand has left me particularly peeved. Granted the team didn't play as well as they might have and were lucky not to have lost 0-5. Granted that New Zealand were ranked #8 and had even lost to Bangladesh earlier in the year. And granted that Dhoni can sometimes be a very stubborn and defensive captain. All of that doesn't diminish the fact that this is a really young and inexperienced side that is learning all the time and these defeats will teach them lessons that will make them better. Dhoni and Ishant Sharma were the only two in this side to have played in NZ prior to this, and come the Test series, Zaheer Khan will join them as the third. Of the 16 players in the ODI squad, nine have played fewer than 25 games outside India and seven have played 15 or fewer. The 14 players in the Test squad (apart from Dhoni, Zaheer, and Ishant) have played a grand total of 40 Test matches outside India (ie less than 3 per player) with Virat Kohli and Murali Vijay the only ones who've played more than 5 matches overseas. Add to that the fact that India's record in New Zealand has never been stellar. To expect these lads to arrive in New Zealand and thump what is building up to be a very good Kiwi side in their home conditions was sheer lunacy.

As the series turns towards the Test matches, the two contrasting captaincy styles will be the key point of interest for me. McCullum jumps at the first opportunity to grab the jugular (and in Southee, Boult, and Wagner he now has a good attack that lets him do so) whereas Dhoni waits and waits before going in for the kill. The selections of the teams will give a clear window into how the teams will play. My bet is that Dhoni will play safe and go in with a line-up similar to that from South Africa, ie with six batsmen and Jadeja as the lone spinner. The third seamer (alongside Zaheer and Shami) will therefore be the main decision for him and Fletcher to make and I would like to see Bhuvneshwar picked ahead of Ishant and Umesh Yadav. He'll provide more control thereby giving Dhoni the option of attacking a bit more with Zaheer and Shami. Using Rohit Sharma wisely (the way the opposition use Kane Williamson) will also be key. As always though, it'll be the batting which will decide India's fortunes and if Kohli, Pujara, Vijay and Rahane can bat the way they did against the Springboks, India will be hard to beat. Much as I'd like to see Dhoni bat at six followed by Ashwin and Jadeja, that ain't gonna happen.

New Zealand on the other hand will probably go in with just five batsmen given that Corey Anderson, and BJ Watling provide enough depth at 6 and 7. Their seam attack is also in really good form at the moment and that's what will really give them the edge going into the two matches. Ish Sodhi will probably struggle as most new spinners do in their first series against India but given the inexperience of the Indian batting and the likelihood of them being more cautious against the Kiwi seamers, it wouldn't be surprising to see Sodhi pick up a few cheap ones. In terms of the batting, Williamson and Taylor will look to carry on their splendid efforts from the ODI series and form the backbone especially given the opening pair are still somewhat unsettled (just like their Indian counterparts).

All in all, should be a fascinating ten days and despite the big gap in the rankings, I wouldn't be surprised to see NZ take the series 1-0. My only complaint is that sitting here in England, most of the action will happen while I'm sound asleep :-)


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...
Post a Comment
Read more

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...
Post a Comment
Read more