Skip to main content

Trouble on the road

Much is being made of the fact that Mahendra Singh Dhoni now has the highest number of overseas losses amongst Indian captains after Auckland. If Christian Ryan's fantasy came true and the fans had their way, he would have been sacked long ago and one of Kohli/Rohit/Pujara made skipper and that alone would have turned India's fortunes. At the risk of coming across as a Dhoni apologist, that's just pure balderdash in my opinion.

First the stats. Dhoni's away win loss ratio is still a good deal better than many captains of the past and of those above him, Wadekar and Kapil Dev's two wins each came in the same year (1971 and 1986 respectively) and they lost the captaincy soon after as losses started to mount. Six of Ganguly's wins came against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe (vs just one for Dhoni) leaving Dravid as the only captain who's undisputedly done better. India (and Dhoni) have taken a severe beating since 2011 and among international captains (with 8 or more away matches) in that period, Dhoni does better than Sammy only whether in terms of wins or win/loss ratio. That is admittedly quite damning and in most other eras, an Indian skipper would not have survived with such a record. If you look at the loss ratio though (ie % of matches lost), Dhoni and India are much better (expectedly) than the West Indies and New Zealand and not too much worse than Pakistan and England. Moreover, a captain is only as good as his team and given that India average 25.5 with the bat (eighth lowest out of ten teams) and 41.86 with the ball, its no wonder they're struggling. Its revealing though that South Africa are the only team that have an away batting average better than their bowling average. Most teams these days struggle away and India are just no different. Dhoni's also been "lucky" (though I'm sure he'd have swapped a few wins for that luck) that its coincided with the retirement of the big four and a complete loss of form for Sehwag and Gambhir, meaning that he's been the only real choice to lead the rebuilding of the side.

And while the results haven't started to turn around quite yet with this young team, a bit of patience is needed and the signs are certainly there that they will grow into a fighting outfit. In just three matches so far, they've already made more than 350 in an innings twice (which is twice as many times as they managed in eight matches against England and Australia in 2011/12) and have scored three hundreds (vs four in those eight matches) with three more individual scores of 95+. The bowling still lags as they've conceded 400+ in three innings out of five and a bit but they have also bowled SA out for under 250 and NZ for 105. At this formative stage in their careers, the likes of Kohli, Pujara, and Rohit Sharma don't really need the added burden of leading the side and given Dhoni's experience of having played over 80 games, the team needs him more than ever.

This is not to say that Dhoni's decisions and his overall approach at times don't leave much to be desired. As a modern day captain he takes the defensive option once too often for my liking and while you could blame that partly on the resources at his disposal, he also comes across as just being more comfortable with that approach. Playing Jadeja ahead of Ashwin is also a funny decision and I would really like Amit Mishra in this side as the sole spinner for overseas games and slot in Bhuvneshwar Kumar ahead of the ageing Zaheer. Dhoni's batting too needs to deliver and its a bit of an embarrassment that a man of his abilities hasn't scored a hundred outside the subcontinent. None of this is likely to change overnight but a strong performance in windy Wellington over the next few days would be a great start.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...

Season ending review

Well, officially the season hasn't quite ended since the last one-dayer between Australia and South Africa still remains to be played but given that its a dead rubber, the season is as good as over. And what a season its been. Probably as much action off-field as on it, but its been riveting throughout and the quality of Test cricket overall (apart from the WI-Eng series) has been top-notch and a welcome reminder of why I like the 5 day format the most. The two Aus-SA series have in particular been fascinating to watch though a lot of it has been driven by Australia waiting too long to make much needed changes. South Africa though has truly come on in leaps and bounds and though they will be losing Kallis and Ntini sooner rather than later, their decreasing reliance on them over the last year or so has meant that they won't be missed much. Their one-day game has come along strongly too and they should have a genuine shot at the World Cup this time. Australia on the other hand h...

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...