Skip to main content

O spinner, where art thou?

An edited version of this piece has been published on ESPNcricinfo here.

December 22, 2013 was a sad day for world cricket. Cricketers like Graeme Swann not only bring their talents to the field but their attitude that conveys sheer joy at playing Test cricket is a much needed commodity. Especially in these days when young spinners are choosing to play the IPL over Test cricket (more on that some other time though). Jon Hotten is right in saying that he's the player the rebuilding England side will miss the most, but arguably world cricket will miss him almost as much. With Swann gone, Harbhajan and Vettori having completely faded away since 2011, and Saeed Ajmal and Rangana Herath (who're both nearly 37) not likely to last much longer, the next great (or even really good) Test match spinners are nowhere in sight.

Most fans of the five day game would probably rate great fast bowling as the thing they like most followed by fine batsmanship. And its now wonder that in most "greatest cricketer" or "my favourite player" lists its these breeds that dominate. In my view though, spin bowling is what imparts a unique rhythm to Test match cricket and makes it so different from other sports. No other role in a team sport requires that mix of patience, focus, and determination combined with the ability to suddenly seize the jugular. My view is likely rose-tinted (and therefore biased) having spent my formative cricket following years watching the likes of Warne, Kumble, Murali, Saqlain, and Mushtaq. And while the five named earlier were not in the same league they were pretty handy. Its why this list of spinners who've taken the most wickets since Swann debuted is such a depressing one. The top five in that list outside of those named here already are Ojha, Lyon, Ashwin, Shakib, and Rehman. All good, honest toilers but none that you'd back to run through a side on a good batting wicket with not too many runs in the bank. And its the same with the rest of the names on that list who are still active (and likely to have much of a career in future). Not one there to thrill or even inspire hope for the future.

The attitude of captains around the world has not helped much either. Nathan Lyon has been dropped by Clarke for the likes of Doherty and Agar who wouldn't make a second XI for an IPL team. India have recently resorted to picking Jadeja as their specialist overseas spinner and England are considering picking Moeen Ali as Swann's replacement. South Africa (who've never had much faith in spinners since readmission) keep dropping Tahir every time he concedes a few boundaries. The recent World T20 tournament offered a glimmer of hope with spinners ending up as six of the top ten wicket takers (Test match playing countries only). But its hard to see the likes of Tahir, Badree, and Mishra forging much of a Test career henceforth let alone emerging as very good. The IPL as well has seen spinners (and leggies in particular) doing really well but bowlers like Tambe, Karn Sharma, Chahal etc struggle to get into their domestic teams for four-day games let alone the national team. Its ironic that the emergence of the shortest format led to fears of spinners becoming extinct but while they're thriving in T20, their future in the five-day format looks bleak.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?