Skip to main content

Of Sunday starts, away wins, series leads, and battling unknowns

In this day and age where commerce rules most of the time even in sport, its very strange that a Test match should start on a Sunday. Not only does that guarantee fewer people at the ground over the five days, the TV audience also gets affected by the weekend only half utilised. The funny scheduling is only apt though in what has been a strange ol' series in a strange ol' year.

In 2013, it seemed like teams had no idea how to win away Test matches any more. Just 3 out of 44 Test matches in the calendar year ended in a visiting team winning and two of those were in Zimbabwe. South Africa were the only team that could claim a creditable away win (over Pakistan in Dubai). A lot of teams must therefore have had some serious amounts of "overseas-winnability" magic potion mixed into their New Year's Eve drinks. Or so you would think looking at the results in 2014 so far. Of the 14 matches that have had a result, nine have been won by the visiting team with Sri Lanka, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and India all claiming away scalps.

India's of course is the most recent with the win at Lord's less than a week ago. It puts them into the unknown territory of holding a lead in an overseas five match series anywhere other than the West Indies. That is not the best of memories though, as in that series in 2002, India surrendered their similarly hard earned 1-0 series lead after two games and rather tamely lost two of the next three. The last time they held a 1-0 lead in a five match series against England also ended in tears in 1985 and on home soil to boot. And Dhoni will also remember first hand how his team gave up a 1-0 lead against Cook's men not too long ago when the odds were all against the English. He will also know though that the 1-0 lead has been achieved without his three most aggressive men (Dhawan, Kohli, and Shami) firing so there is some gas in the tank potentially. And it will be needed as over a long series, the same players can't come to the party all the time and not every batting wobble will be recovered from. That will hopefully mean an end to the Stuart Binny experiment and Rohit Sharma coming in to bolster the batting (as seems likely?).

England are also battling the unknown with a 10 match "no-win" streak and seemingly no turnaround in sight. They are nowhere near as bad as Jarrod Kimber makes them out to be, but they do have big challenges. Like India, some of their most aggressive players (Bell, Broad, and Prior) haven't taken off and now one of them has stepped away. They will hope that Broad at least doesn't follow suit. Since his punishing return to form on India's last visit to these shores, Broad has been England's best bowler at home by a distance (whether its in terms of wickets, strike rate or averages). A matchwinning spell from him and England will believe again, no matter if Cook's poor run with the bat continues. Bell is due some runs too and Buttler's selection at least shows that not all of their intent is gone yet. Bringing back Jordan for Stokes would be the final aggressive move they need to make and I would still give them a fighting chance.

Into the mix of unknowns will be the pitch and conditions at the Ageas Bowl and it'll be interesting to see what the captain who wins the toss decides to do. Dhoni has shown a more aggressive side to him and Cook no longer has the option to be conservative. The third day is often the pivotal one in Test matches and this third match is likely to be similarly decisive. With the weather set fair, it should be fascinating watching.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...